Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

07:30
A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Accuracy of a damage-based reconstruction method in NHTSA side crash tests
Nicholas S Johnson1, Hampton C Gabler
1Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University, Center for Injury Biomechanics, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA.
Traffic Injury Prevention
|January 14, 2012
Summary
The WinSMASH software overpredicts vehicle Delta-V (ΔV) in side crashes by 20% due to inaccurate energy absorption estimates and assuming no restitution. Accurate inputs improve Delta-V reconstruction accuracy in crash analysis.
Area of Science:
- Automotive Safety Engineering
- Crashworthiness Analysis
- Injury Biomechanics
Background:
- Delta-V (ΔV) is a critical metric for predicting vehicle crash injury risk.
- The WinSMASH computer code, derived from CRASH3, estimates ΔV using vehicle deformation data.
- Accurate ΔV reconstruction is essential for understanding crash dynamics and improving vehicle safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of WinSMASH software in reconstructing Delta-V (ΔV) from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) side crash tests.
- To identify factors contributing to discrepancies between reconstructed and measured ΔV.
- To assess the impact of energy absorption and restitution assumptions on ΔV prediction accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 168 NHTSA dynamic side impact tests.
- Determined actual ΔV from test instrumentation for each crash.
- Reconstructed struck vehicle ΔV using WinSMASH and compared results to measured values.
Main Results:
- WinSMASH overpredicted maximum crush ΔV by an average of 20% when using vehicle-specific stiffnesses.
- Overprediction of absorbed energy by 40% was observed, consistent with ΔV overestimation.
- When provided with accurate absorbed energy data, WinSMASH reconstructions showed minimal error.
Conclusions:
- WinSMASH overestimates ΔV in NHTSA side crash tests primarily due to inaccurate absorbed energy calculations and the assumption of zero restitution.
- The software's stiffness parameters may be based on artificially high energies, leading to overestimation.
- Accurate input parameters, particularly energy absorption, are crucial for reliable ΔV reconstruction with WinSMASH.

