Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Identifying, documenting, and reviewing preferred place of death: an audit of one UK hospice
Susan Walker1, Sue Read, Helena Priest
1Institute for Social Sciences, Keele Universtiy, Staffordshire, ST6 4BG, UK. s.walker@ilcs.keele.ac.uk
Background:
Current UK health-care policy suggests that good end-of-life care includes choosing a place for death. This paper examines the extent to which patients' preferred place of death (PPD) is identified, documented, and reviewed in one UK hospice.
Method:
A total of 150 case notes were audited using a data capture form. Case notes of patients who died in January 2008 (n=50), January 2009 (n=50), and January 2010 (n=50) were accessed during September-November 2010. The data are presented using descriptive statistics.
Results:
PPD was documented in 28 cases (18.6%), conversations about end-of-life preferences were documented in 16 cases (10.6%), and preferences were reviewed in 6 cases (4%). Of the 28 patients whose preferences were documented, 25 (89.2%) died in their stated place of choice.
Conclusions:
Rates of PPD identification, documentation, and review were low at this hospice. This raises further research questions about how and why end-of-life choices are being made.
Related Concept Videos
Continuing Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...