Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

RNA Next-Generation Sequencing and a Bioinformatics Pipeline to Identify Expressed LINE-1s at the Locus-Specific Level
Published on: May 19, 2019
LTR retrotransposons in fungi
Anna Muszewska1, Marta Hoffman-Sommer, Marcin Grynberg
1Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. musze@icm.edu.pl
Transposable elements (TEs) in fungal genomes, particularly Ty1/Copia and Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposons, show highly variable abundance. Expansions often involve increased copy numbers and types, with Ty3/Gypsy elements dominating.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Molecular Biology
- Evolutionary Biology
Background:
- Transposable elements (TEs) with long terminal direct repeats (LTR TEs) are mobile genetic elements found in most eukaryotic genomes.
- Their abundance and conservation offer insights into genome dynamics.
- LTR TEs are classified into Ty1/Copia and Ty3/Gypsy superfamilies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively identify and analyze LTR-containing retrotransposons across published fungal genomes.
- To investigate the genome-ecology of these elements, focusing on abundance and expansion patterns.
- To explore the evolutionary relationships of TE protein domains.
Main Methods:
- Bioinformatic search for LTR retrotransposons in fungal genome databases.
- Identification of complete and remnant TE copies.
- Genome-ecology analysis of TE abundance and types.
- Phylogenetic analysis of TE elements and protein domains.
Main Results:
- Over 66,000 LTR TEs were identified, belonging to Ty1/Copia and Ty3/Gypsy superfamilies.
- Fungal genomes exhibit significant variability in TE content, ranging from scarce (<50) to highly expanded (>8000) elements.
- Transposon expansions typically involve increases in both copy number and element diversity.
- Ty3/Gypsy elements, particularly Chromoviridae, are the most abundant highest-copy TEs.
- Phylogenetic analyses indicate independent TE expansion events across diverse fungal lineages.
- Protease domains evolve fastest, while reverse transcriptase and RNase H evolve slower and cohesively.
Conclusions:
- Fungal genomes display dynamic LTR TE landscapes with independent expansion events.
- Ty3/Gypsy elements play a significant role in fungal genome evolution and dynamics.
- Differential evolution rates of transposon domains suggest distinct functional constraints.
Related Concept Videos
Transposons
LTR Retrotransposons
The internal coding region of LTR retrotransposons and their mechanism of transposition closely resembles a...
Non-LTR Retrotransposons
Retroviruses
DNA-only Transposons
The donor site from where the transposon is excised is either degraded or...
Overview of Transposition and Recombination

