Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In-Silico Design of a Novel Tridecapeptide Targeting Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern.

International journal of peptide research and therapeutics·2021
Same author

Evaluation of Salivary Alpha-Amylase Levels for Determining Stress Variations in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia for Infra-Umbilical Surgery.

International journal of applied & basic medical research·2021
Same author

Hydrothermal treatment of metal impregnated biomass for the generation of H<sub>2</sub> and nanometal carbon hybrids.

Environmental research·2021
Same author

Probucol attenuates NF-κB/NLRP3 signalling and augments Nrf-2 mediated antioxidant defence in nerve injury induced neuropathic pain.

International immunopharmacology·2021
Same author

Intraventricular Craniopharyngiomas-Overcoming Their Relative Inaccessibility: Institutional Experience With a Review of Literature.

Frontiers in neurology·2021
Same author

Disordered regions tune order in chromatin organization and function.

Biophysical chemistry·2021
Same journal

Topological data analysis for antibody-drug conjugate payload discovery: a computational framework for mechanistic classification and target validation.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Commentary on the fundamentals and development of artificial intelligence models in the life sciences and best research practices.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

RANQSAR: a standalone open-source application for reproducible machine learning-based QSAR analysis.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Integrating evolutionary and compositional features with ML and DL for robust and interpretable druggable protein prediction.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

QUAD: a composite risk framework integrating uncertainty, applicability domain, and model disagreement for reliable QSAR predictions.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Comparative quantum-chemical investigation of 2-chloro-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)acetamide and 2-(4-methoxyphenylamino)-2-oxoethyl meth/acrylate: DFT, TD-DFT, and non-covalent interaction analyses.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
08:35

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source

Published on: May 29, 2021

Computational fragment-based screening using RosettaLigand: the SAMPL3 challenge.

Ashutosh Kumar1, Kam Y J Zhang

  • 1Zhang Initiative Research Unit, Advanced Science Institute, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
|January 17, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Participating in the SAMPL3 challenge, this study evaluated a virtual fragment screening protocol. The findings emphasize that blind testing is crucial and performance improves with known actives and optimized parameters.

More Related Videos

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery
06:26

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery

Published on: May 16, 2021

Workflow and Tools for Crystallographic Fragment Screening at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin
06:29

Workflow and Tools for Crystallographic Fragment Screening at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin

Published on: March 3, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
08:35

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source

Published on: May 29, 2021

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery
06:26

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery

Published on: May 16, 2021

Workflow and Tools for Crystallographic Fragment Screening at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin
06:29

Workflow and Tools for Crystallographic Fragment Screening at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin

Published on: March 3, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Structural biology

Background:

  • The SAMPL3 (Statistical Assessment of Molecular Sampling and Physical Models) challenge offers a blind testing environment for virtual screening methods.
  • Evaluating virtual fragment screening protocols is essential for advancing drug discovery techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess a virtual fragment screening protocol using RosettaLigand against bovine pancreatic trypsin within the SAMPL3 challenge.
  • To identify factors influencing the success of fragment-based virtual screening.

Main Methods:

  • Screening of a 500-fragment Maybridge library using RosettaLigand.
  • Evaluation of virtual screening performance in a blind testing scenario.
  • Analysis of the impact of known active compounds, parameter selection, and receptor ensembles.

Main Results:

  • Virtual screening performance is enhanced by the availability of known active compounds and optimized parameters.
  • Accurate ligand orientation and conformation depend on appropriate partial charge calculation methods.
  • Using multiple receptor ensembles does not consistently improve docking enrichment compared to individual receptors.

Conclusions:

  • Blind testing environments like SAMPL3 are critical for validating virtual screening approaches.
  • Fragment screening success can be significantly increased through careful selection of receptor structures, protein flexibility, conformational sampling, and accurate partial charge assignments.