Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Additive latency effects of selective and nonselective restricted priming types.

E Buckolz1, C Alain, C Sarrazin

  • 1Faculty of Physical Education, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Canadian Journal of Psychology
|September 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

This study supports a third type of priming, nonselective restricted (NSR) priming, distinct from selective and general priming. Response probability controls NSR priming, while prediction probability influences selective priming.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"France's 10-year journey with mid-urethral slings: The rise of the TVT".

The French journal of urology·2025
Same author

[Strategietreffen: Virushepatitis in Deutschland eliminieren].

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2023
Same author

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2020
Same author

Severe underquantification of HIV-1 group O isolates by major commercial PCR-based assays.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2020
Same author

Letter: impact of HBV genotypes and PC/BCP mutations on serum HBsAg levels in Chinese HBeAg negative patients-Authors' reply.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2018
Same author

Editorial: HBsAg serum levels in HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection-is it a matter of genotype? Authors' reply.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Previous research proposed two main types of priming: nonselective general priming (influenced by foreperiod duration) and selective priming (influenced by prediction probability).
  • A third type, nonselective restricted (NSR) priming, has been hypothesized, controlled by response probability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the existence and characteristics of nonselective restricted (NSR) priming.
  • To differentiate NSR priming from selective priming and nonselective general priming.

Main Methods:

  • A four-choice reaction time (RT) task was employed.
  • Varying levels of prediction probability (response likelihood) and response probability (task necessity) were manipulated.
  • Reaction times for prepared and unprepared responses were analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Prediction probability and response probability had significant, independent effects on RTs for prepared responses, supporting distinct priming types.
  • Prediction probability, but not response probability, affected RTs for unprepared responses.
  • Evidence supported the nonselective nature of NSR priming, where all outputs are equally affected by response probability changes.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the existence of NSR priming, distinct from selective priming.
  • Response probability is a key factor in NSR priming, while prediction probability influences selective priming.
  • The study clarifies the distinct mechanisms underlying different types of priming in reaction time tasks.