Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

07:46
Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls
Published on: July 12, 2024
Effect of castration technique on beef calf performance, feed efficiency, and inflammatory response
T M Warnock1, T A Thrift, M Irsik
1Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
Journal of Animal Science
|January 17, 2012
Summary
The castration technique did not significantly impact overall growth, feed intake, or water intake in beef calves over an 84-day period. However, surgical castration methods induced a short-term inflammatory response, while banding caused a delayed reaction.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Veterinary Medicine
- Beef Cattle Production
Background:
- Castration is a common practice in beef production to improve carcass quality and manage behavior.
- Different castration techniques exist, including surgical methods and banding, each with potential impacts on animal welfare and performance.
- Understanding the effects of these techniques on physiological responses is crucial for optimizing beef calf management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of various castration techniques on daily feed intake (DFI), daily water intake (DWI), growth performance, residual feed intake (RFI), and inflammatory responses in weaned beef calves.
- To compare the effects of pre-weaning surgical castration versus castration at weaning using different methods (banding, surgical emasculator, Henderson Castrating Tool).
- To determine if castration method influences acute phase protein levels as an indicator of inflammatory response.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-five weaned beef calves were assigned to five treatment groups: pre-weaning surgical castration (CON), intact bulls (BULL), banding (BAN), Henderson Castrating Tool (HEN), and surgical emasculator (SUR).
- Calves were housed in a GrowSafe facility for 84 days, with DFI, DWI, and growth performance monitored.
- Blood samples were collected at multiple time points post-castration to analyze acute phase proteins, assessing inflammatory response.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in average daily gain (ADG), DFI, DWI, or gain:feed were observed among castration techniques over the 84-day trial.
- Surgical castration (SUR, HEN) induced a short-term inflammatory response, while banding (BAN) resulted in a delayed inflammatory response.
- Pre-weaning castration showed improved ADG, feed intake, and inflammation response in the initial 14 days compared to castration at weaning.
Conclusions:
- Castration method did not significantly affect overall performance, feed intake, water intake, or inflammatory response in weaned beef calves over an 84-day period.
- Surgical castration methods (emasculator, Henderson tool) caused a more immediate inflammatory response, whereas banding led to a delayed response.
- Pre-weaning castration may offer some advantages in early performance and reduced inflammation compared to castration at weaning.

