Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay01:33

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

In 1971, Peter Perlman and Eva Engvall developed an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA or EIA). ELISA differs from western blot in that the assays are conducted in microtiter plates or in vivo rather than on an absorbent membrane.
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen.  Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or quantified.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vaccine Ligand Binding Assay Life Cycle Management, Assay Maintenance, Monitoring and Transfer.

Bioanalysis·2026
Same author

2025 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Biomarkers Calibrators & Stability; Evaluation of NULISA; Neurofilament & Autoantibody Biomarker Assays; Removing IgM Interference; ELISpot & FluoroSpot Best Practices; Modular HD Cytometry; Single-cell Analysis Imaging Cytometry (PART 2A - Recommendations on Biomarkers Discovery, Development, Validation & Regulatory Approval, Ligand-Binding Assays (LBA) and Cell-Based Assays (CBA) PART 2B - Regulatory Agencies' Input on Biomarkers, IVD/CDx and Biomarker Assay Validation (BAV)).

Bioanalysis·2026
Same author

Comparative assessment of a multiplex micro-chip immunoassay, VaxArray, and meso scale discovery assay for serotype-specific coronavirus IgG quantitation.

Journal of immunological methods·2025
Same author

Application of DOE to ELISA Robustness and Ruggedness Assessment.

The AAPS journal·2025
Same author

Harmonization of Vaccine Ligand Binding Assays Validation.

Bioanalysis·2024
Same author

Qualification of a 21-valent pneumococcal urine antigen detection assay and development of clinical positivity cutoffs.

Bioanalysis·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays
09:58

Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays

Published on: June 23, 2022

Miniaturized immunoassays: moving beyond the microplate.

Thorsten Verch1, Ray Bakhtiar

  • 1Merck & Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, PO Box 4, West Point, PA 19486, USA.

Bioanalysis
|January 19, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Microfluidic immunoassays enhance protein biomarker analysis in diagnostics and drug development. This review explores commercial applications and platform technologies, discussing their pros and cons.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Immunoassays have been crucial for protein biomarker analysis for over 40 years.
  • Technological advancements like monoclonal antibodies, novel labels, and microfluidics have significantly improved immunoassay performance.
  • Microfluidic platforms offer miniaturized and efficient solutions for complex biological analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the commercial applications of microfluidic immunoassays.
  • To highlight key academic examples of microfluidic immunoassay development.
  • To discuss the general advantages and disadvantages of various microfluidic immunoassay platforms.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of commercial and academic microfluidic immunoassay applications.

More Related Videos

Snap Chip for Cross-reactivity-free and Spotter-free Multiplexed Sandwich Immunoassays
10:44

Snap Chip for Cross-reactivity-free and Spotter-free Multiplexed Sandwich Immunoassays

Published on: November 13, 2017

Electrowetting-based Digital Microfluidics Platform for Automated Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
08:22

Electrowetting-based Digital Microfluidics Platform for Automated Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Published on: February 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays
09:58

Computer Numerical Control Micromilling of a Microfluidic Acrylic Device with a Staggered Restriction for Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassays

Published on: June 23, 2022

Snap Chip for Cross-reactivity-free and Spotter-free Multiplexed Sandwich Immunoassays
10:44

Snap Chip for Cross-reactivity-free and Spotter-free Multiplexed Sandwich Immunoassays

Published on: November 13, 2017

Electrowetting-based Digital Microfluidics Platform for Automated Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
08:22

Electrowetting-based Digital Microfluidics Platform for Automated Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Published on: February 23, 2020

  • Analysis of different microfluidic immunoassay platforms (e.g., CD assays, lab-on-a-chip, arrays, digital electrochemical assays).
  • Discussion of technological advancements and their impact on immunoassay development.
  • Main Results:

    • Microfluidic immunoassays are increasingly adopted in clinical diagnostics and drug development.
    • Various microfluidic platforms demonstrate potential for high-throughput and sensitive protein biomarker detection.
    • Commercial success is observed for specific microfluidic immunoassay designs, while others remain in academic research.

    Conclusions:

    • Microfluidic immunoassays represent a significant evolution in protein biomarker analysis.
    • The choice of microfluidic platform depends on specific application requirements, balancing performance, cost, and complexity.
    • Continued innovation in microfluidics promises further advancements in diagnostic and drug development tools.