Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
An adaptive group sequential phase II design to compare treatments for survival endpoints in rare patient entities
Christina Wunder1, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Lutz Edler
1Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. c.wunder@dkfz.de
Abstract:
For rare diseases, standard treatments are often not available and essential study parameters are difficult or impossible to obtain. Therefore, designs of clinical trials for these diseases are often based on little information. Adaptive designs allow such trials to be started and to gain information during the study. Motivated by a trial for a rare subtype of renal-cell carcinoma, we present a two-stage adaptive design for right-censored time-to-event data and a two-sided test. After the first stage, one can stop for futility or continue with reestimated sample size. The properties of such designs are analyzed by simulation studies.
Insights
Adaptive clinical trial designs enable rare disease studies to begin with limited data. This two-stage approach allows for futility stopping or sample size re-estimation, optimizing rare cancer research.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Rare Diseases
Background:
- Standard clinical trial designs face challenges in rare disease research due to limited data and unavailable treatments.
- Essential study parameters are often difficult or impossible to obtain for rare conditions, hindering trial planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a novel two-stage adaptive design for clinical trials involving right-censored time-to-event data.
- To address the challenges of conducting clinical trials for rare diseases, using a rare subtype of renal-cell carcinoma as motivation.
Main Methods:
- The proposed design is a two-stage adaptive approach for time-to-event data analysis.
- It incorporates a two-sided statistical test.
- The design allows for interim decisions, including stopping for futility or continuing with a re-estimated sample size.
Main Results:
- Simulation studies were conducted to analyze the properties of the proposed adaptive design.
- The design facilitates the initiation of trials with limited information and allows for data-driven adjustments.
Conclusions:
- Adaptive designs offer a flexible framework for rare disease clinical trials, enabling studies to commence and adapt as data emerge.
- This two-stage design provides a structured method for decision-making during the trial, optimizing resource allocation and information gain.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Kaplan-Meier Approach
