Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Implications of the WHO Child Growth Standards in rural Honduras
Erin K Nichols1, Joseph S Nichols, Beatrice J Selwyn
1School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. igd1@cdc.gov
Insights
Comparing growth references impacts malnutrition prevalence calculations in children. The 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards show different results for stunting and overweight compared to the 1977 NCHS reference.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Public Health Surveillance
- Anthropometry
Background:
- Accurate assessment of child malnutrition relies on appropriate growth references.
- The 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards replaced the 1977 NCHS international growth reference, potentially altering prevalence estimates.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for effective public health interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of using the 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards versus the 1977 NCHS reference on chronic malnutrition prevalence in children aged 6.0-59.9 months.
- To compare anthropometric Z-scores (HAZ, WAZ, WHZ) calculated using both references.
- To evaluate the agreement and differences in nutritional status classifications between the two references.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study in rural Honduras involving children aged 6.0-59.9 months.
- Computation of height-for-age (HAZ), weight-for-age (WAZ), and weight-for-height (WHZ) Z-scores using both WHO standards and NCHS reference.
- Statistical comparison using Bland-Altman plots, percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and proportion analysis.
Main Results:
- WHO standards resulted in lower mean HAZ but higher mean WAZ and WHZ compared to NCHS.
- Good agreement in Z-score categories was observed, with exceptions for HAZ in specific male age groups and WHZ in older males.
- WHO standards indicated higher proportions of stunting and overweight, and lower proportions of underweight.
Conclusions:
- The selection of growth reference/standard significantly influences the calculated prevalence of childhood malnutrition.
- Methodological and policy implications arise from the choice of growth references.
- Nutritional data derived from different growth references require cautious interpretation due to potential discrepancies.
Objective:
The present study analysed the impact of using the 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards ('the WHO standards') compared with the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) international growth reference ('the NCHS reference') on the calculated prevalence of chronic malnutrition in children aged 6·0-59·9 months.
Design:
Anthropometric data were collected as part of a cross-sectional study exploring the association between household environments and nutritional status of children. Z-scores were computed for height-for-age (HAZ), weight-for-age (WAZ) and weight-for-height (WHZ) using each reference/standard. Results were compared using Bland-Altman plots, percentage agreement, kappa statistics, line graphs and proportion of children in Z-score categories.
Setting:
The study was conducted in thirteen rural villages within Honduras's department of Intibucá.
Subjects:
Children aged 6·0-59·9 months were the focus of the analysis, and households with children in this age range served as the sampling unit for the study.
Results:
The WHO standards yielded lower means for HAZ and higher means for WAZ and WHZ compared with the NCHS reference. The WHO standards and NCHS reference showed good agreement between Z-score categories, except for HAZ among males aged 24·0-35·9 months and WHZ among males aged >24·0 months. Using the WHO standards resulted in higher proportions of stunting (low HAZ) and overweight (high WHZ) and lower proportions of underweight (low WAZ). The degree of difference among these measures varied by age and gender.
Conclusions:
The choice of growth reference/standard employed in nutritional surveys may have important methodological and policy implications. While ostensibly comparable, data on nutritional indicators derived with different growth references/standards must be interpreted cautiously.
More Related Videos
08:10Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
Published on: February 2, 2018
10:57Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Population Growth
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...