Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Reexamining the Relationship Between Stereopsis and Motion Parallax.

Annual review of vision science·2026

Same author

Conflicting ordinal and metric depth information interferes with depth matching.

Journal of vision·2026

Same author

Contributions of headset IPD fit, vection and sway to cybersickness during head mounted display based virtual reality.

Applied ergonomics·2026

Same author

Differences in perceived travel distance from central versus peripheral optic flow are the same when standing and walking.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Depth Cue Conflicts Between Real and Virtual Objects Disrupt Visually-Guided Reaching in Augmented Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026

Same author

Axes of self-motion and object motion shape how we perceive world-relative motion.

Scientific reports·2026

Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Motion aftereffect in depth based on binocular information.

Yuichi Sakano¹, Robert S Allison, Ian P Howard

¹Universal Communication Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Keihanna Science City, Kyoto, Japan. yuichi@nict.go.jp

Journal of Vision

|January 19, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A negative motion aftereffect in depth occurs after adapting to stimuli with changing interocular velocity differences. This suggests a neural mechanism sensitive to interocular velocity, not just changing disparity, underlies motion in depth perception.

More Related Videos

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

Area of Science:

Visual neuroscience
Perception psychology

Background:

Motion in depth perception relies on various visual cues.
Disparity and interocular velocity are key cues for depth motion.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the role of interocular velocity differences versus changing disparity in motion aftereffects in depth.
To determine if specific neural mechanisms are adaptable to these cues.

Main Methods:

Used random-element stereograms with controlled temporal and binocular correlations to dissociate cues.
Adapted participants to stimuli varying in changing disparity and/or interocular velocity.
Tested for motion aftereffects in depth using binocular and monocular stimuli.

Main Results:

Adaptation to temporally correlated stereograms (with interocular velocity differences) induced a significant motion aftereffect in depth.
Adaptation to binocularly correlated stereograms (with changing disparity) produced little to no aftereffect.
A comparable aftereffect was observed even with monocular testing after temporal adaptation.

Conclusions:

Results support an adaptable neural mechanism sensitive to interocular velocity differences in motion-in-depth processing.
No evidence was found for an adaptable mechanism specialized for motion in depth based solely on changing disparity.