Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Electroretinogram Recording for Infants and Children under Anesthesia to Achieve Optimal Dark Adaptation and International Standards
08:38

Electroretinogram Recording for Infants and Children under Anesthesia to Achieve Optimal Dark Adaptation and International Standards

Published on: September 3, 2020

6.6K

Adaptive trials in paediatric development: dealing with heterogeneity and uncertainty in pharmacokinetic differences

Massimo Cella1, Meindert Danhof, Oscar Della Pasqua

  • 1LACDR, Division of Pharmacology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
|January 20, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Adaptive dosing in pediatric trials optimizes drug exposure, improving efficacy compared to fixed doses. This approach enhances clinical trial power and understanding of dose-response relationships.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Pediatric Pharmacology

Background:

  • Standard fixed-dose regimens in pediatric clinical trials may not achieve optimal drug exposure.
  • Individual variability in pharmacokinetics can lead to sub-therapeutic or toxic drug levels.
  • Optimizing dosing is crucial for demonstrating efficacy and safety in pediatric populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate an adaptive trial design using variable dosing and controlled exposure.
  • To compare the effectiveness of adaptive dosing versus fixed dosing in pediatric trials.
  • To determine if adaptive designs improve dosing recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated a pediatric clinical trial using a pharmacokinetic model for abacavir.
  • Calculated area under the curve (AUC) for exposure and adapted doses to target levels.
  • Compared exposure distributions between fixed-dose and controlled-exposure simulations.

Main Results:

  • Fixed dosing resulted in 61 of 128 subjects outside the target exposure range (median AUC 6.43 mg·h/L).
  • Adaptive dosing significantly narrowed the exposure distribution (median AUC 6.94 mg·h/L).
  • Only 14 subjects deviated from the target exposure range after dose adjustment.

Conclusions:

  • Adaptive randomization optimizes dosing regimens in early pediatric clinical trials.
  • Randomizing to target exposure increases study power and probability of demonstrating efficacy.
  • Adaptive designs enhance understanding of dose's role in clinical response heterogeneity.
Abstract

More Related Videos

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography08:00

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

Published on: April 8, 2019

9.6K
Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism10:11

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism

Published on: December 14, 2012

19.1K

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
33.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
54.2K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
106.0K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
84.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.8K