Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026
Electroporation of Craniofacial Mesenchyme
Published on: November 28, 2011
[Effect of electroporation-mediated gene transfect on the expression of cyclins during mandible distraction in
Guo-Ping Wu1, Shao-Lan Li, Chun-Bing Hu
1Department of Plastic Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Luzhou Medical College, Luzhou 646000, China.
Objective:
To investigate the effect of electroporation-mediated gene transfect on the expression of cyclins during mandible distraction in rabbit.
Methods:
Bilateral mandibular osteotomy was performed in 45 New-Zeland rabbits. After a latency of 3 days, the mandibles were elongated using distractors with a rate of 0.8 mm/day for 7 days. After the completion of distraction, the rabbits were randomly divided into 5 groups. 2 microg (0.1 microg/microl) of pIRES-hVEGF165-hBMP2, recombinant plasmid pIRES-hBMP2, recombinant plasmid pIRES-hVEGF165, pIRES and the same volume of normal saline (NS) was injected into the distraction area in each group, respectively. After injection, electroporation was performed in every group. Three animals in each group were sacrificed at 7, 14, and 28 days after completion of distraction, respectively. The lengthened mandibles were harvested and processed for immunohistochemical examinations. The expression of cyclins A, D1 ,E in positive cells were measured by CMIAS-2001A computerized image analyzer. The data were analyzed with the single factor analysis of variance and q test.
Results:
Cyclins A, D1, E staining was mainly located in inflammatory cells, granulation tissue monocyte, fibroblast, osteoblasts, osteocyte and the connective tissues around the new bone. The expression reached to the peak at 7th day of consolidation, and decreased at 14th day, and weak at 28th day. Image analysis results showed that, at 7th day, the expression absorbance A in group C (0.59 +/- 0.14) was the strongest, compared to group A (0.41 +/- 0.13), B (0.38 +/- 0.14), D (0.34 +/- 0.12) and E (0.31 +/- 0.10), showing a significant difference (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). There was no significance difference between group A and B (P > 0.05), but the difference between group A/B and group D/E (P < 0.05). At 14th and 28th day, there was no significant difference among group A (0.39 +/- 0.11), B (0.34 +/- 0.10) and C (0.33 +/- 0.09) (P > 0.05), but there was significant difference between group A/B/C and group D (0.19 +/- 0.12) or E (0.14 +/- 0.04) (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
Electroporation-mediated gene transfection can promote cyclins A, D1, E expression effectively, which may promote cell differentiation and proliferation, stimulate extracellular matrix synthesis and new bone formation in distraction gap.
