Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Diagnostic and prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in low-risk
Laura Evangelista1, Luca Nai Fovino, Francesca Saladini
1Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Medical Clinic IV, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Insights
Gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reveals significant differences in myocardial perfusion and ventricular volumes between patients with and without left bundle-branch block (LBBB). These findings impact risk stratification and prognosis in LBBB patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Left bundle-branch block (LBBB) complicates myocardial perfusion imaging, reducing the accuracy of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk assessment.
- Abnormal left ventricular activation in LBBB can cause perfusion defects, mimicking CAD.
- Gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a valuable tool for assessing cardiac function and perfusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of gated SPECT in low-risk patients with LBBB.
- To compare myocardial perfusion and ventricular function parameters between patients with and without LBBB.
- To identify potential early markers of diastolic dysfunction in LBBB patients.
Main Methods:
- 114 patients underwent Tc-99m sestamibi gated SPECT, divided into groups with (n=57) and without (n=57) LBBB.
- Coronary angiography was performed, and patients were stratified for CAD risk.
- Quantified SPECT parameters included summed stress score, summed rest score, summed difference score, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- Mean variations in EDV and ESV (rest minus post-stress) were calculated.
- Cardiac events were tracked over a mean follow-up of 32 months.
Main Results:
- Gated SPECT positivity was significantly higher in LBBB patients (58%) compared to non-LBBB patients (14%) (P<0.001).
- LBBB patients exhibited higher summed stress scores, EDV, and ESV.
- A significant increase in EDV was observed in LBBB patients from rest to post-stress (1.32 ml vs. -2.21 ml in non-LBBB, P<0.05).
- Cardiac events occurred more frequently in LBBB patients (35% vs. 12%, P<0.01) over follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Gated SPECT reveals distinct functional and perfusion differences between patients with and without LBBB.
- In LBBB patients, a decrease in EDV from rest to post-stress may indicate early diastolic dysfunction.
- This diastolic dysfunction marker could predict reduced LVEF and impact patient prognosis.
Background:
The abnormal left ventricular activation pattern in patients with a left bundle-branch block (LBBB) frequently induces myocardial perfusion defects, decreasing the specificity of noninvasive coronary-risk stratification with stress testing. We assessed the diagnostic and prognostic impact of gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in low-risk patients with LBBB.
Methods:
A total of 114 patients underwent dual-day protocol Tc-99m sestamibi gated SPECT and were divided into two subsets: without LBBB (group 1, n = 57) and with LBBB (group 2, n = 57). Sixty-eight (60%) patients had negative coronary angiography and 46 (40%) were at a low risk for coronary artery disease. The variables incorporating the extent and severity of perfusion defects were calculated: summed stress score, summed rest score and summed difference score, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and left ventricular ejection fraction. The mean variations in EDV and ESV were computed as follows: rest volume-poststress volume. Cardiac events were classified as major and minor.
Results:
Gated SPECT was positive in eight (14%) patients of group 1 and 33 (58%) patients of group 2 (P<0.001). The summed stress score was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (4.7 ± 4.8 vs. 0.9 ± 1.8, P<0.001); similarly, EDV and ESV were significantly higher in LBBB patients (P<0.05 in both). The mean variation in EDV was -2.21 ml for group 1 and 1.32 ml for group 2 (P<0.05). After a mean follow-up period of 32 ± 19 months, cardiac events occurred in 22 (23%) patients, six of group 1 and 16 of group 2 (12 vs. 35%, P<0.01).
Conclusion:
Functional and perfusion parameters obtained by gated SPECT are different between patients with and without LBBB. In LBBB patients, the decrease in EDV between rest and poststress could be considered an early marker of diastolic dysfunction that might anticipate left ventricular ejection fraction reduction and may have an impact on prognosis.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT