Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

A New Murine Model of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Published on: July 7, 2013
Clinical efficacy of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Bong-Su Son1, Sung Woon Chung, Chungwon Lee
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Korea.
Background:
Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has come into use and been widely extended because of the low complication rate and less-invasiveness. This article aimed to describe our experience in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with EVAR.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective review was conducted for the 22 patients who underwent EVAR in a single hospital December 2001 to June 2009.
Results:
The mean age of the patients was 68.5±7.6 years. There were several risk factors and comorbidities in 20 patients (90.9%). The mean diameter of the aortic aneurysms was 61.2±12.9 mm. The mean length, diameter, and angle of the aneurysmal neck were 30.5±15.5 mm, 24.0±4.5 mm, and 43.9±16.0°, respectively. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 28.8±29.5 months. The 30-day postoperative mortality was none. Seven patients (31.8%) had endoleaks during the hospital stay and three patients (13.6%) had endoleaks during the follow-up period. One patient (4.5%) died due to a ruptured aortic aneurysm. The cumulative patient survival rates were 88.2%, 88.2%, and 70.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up, respectively.
Conclusion:
EVAR is currently a safe, feasible procedure for high risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm because of low postoperative complication and mortality if patients are selected properly and followed up carefully.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
