Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Role of Cochrane reviews in pediatric neurology
Wolfgang Girisch1, Christiane Willhelm, Sven Gottschling
1Medical School, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
Insights
Evidence-based medicine in pediatric neurology requires more high-quality research. Many Cochrane reviews lacked sufficient pediatric data, leading to inconclusive findings and limiting the best quality of care.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Pediatric Care
Background:
- Evidence-based medicine is crucial for optimal pediatric neurology care.
- Cochrane reviews are a key source of evidence for medical interventions.
- Previous reviews have varied in their conclusions regarding treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality and findings of Cochrane reviews in pediatric neurology from 1996-2010.
- To identify limitations in existing research and guide future study design.
- To assess the proportion of conclusive versus inconclusive evidence in pediatric neurology.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature review of Cochrane reviews published between 1996 and 2010.
- Inclusion criteria focused on reviews relevant to pediatric neurology.
- Categorization of reviews based on recommendations (positive, conditional, negative, no difference, inconclusive).
Main Results:
- 112 reviews were analyzed; only 17 exclusively focused on pediatric populations.
- A significant proportion of reviews (33/112) provided clear recommendations, while 30 were inconclusive.
- Common criticisms included heterogeneous populations, small sample sizes, and lack of study comparability.
Conclusions:
- There is a persistent need for high-quality research in pediatric neurology.
- Inconclusive findings increased over time, highlighting methodological challenges.
- Future randomized controlled trials should prioritize pediatric-specific populations to improve evidence quality.
Abstract:
Evidence-based medicine in pediatric neurology is considered an important contributor to the best quality of care. We performed a literature review of all Cochrane reviews from 1996-2010 in pediatric neurology. Some reviews concluded that a certain intervention provided benefits, some concluded that certain interventions should not be performed, and some concluded that the current level of evidence was inconclusive. One hundred and twelve reviews were enrolled; only 17 exclusively involved children. In 33/112, a clear recommendation in favor of a certain intervention was given, 11/112 issued a conditionally positive recommendation, and 32/112 concluded that certain interventions should not be performed. Six concluded that no differences were evident between different therapeutic/treatment options. Thirty were inconclusive. The proportion of inconclusive reviews increased during three a priori defined time intervals. Common criticisms regarding quality of enrolled studies included heterogeneous study populations (49/112), a small number of participants (48/112), and a lack of comparability of studies (40/112). An ongoing need exists for high-quality research to reduce the proportion of inconclusive meta-analyses. Further randomized, controlled trials should involve only pediatric populations.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Clinical Trials: Overview
