Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Introduction to Epidemiology

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[The troubled epistemology of the first wave of research on Covid-19].

Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique·2020

Same author

[Perioperative conflicts between anaesthesiologists and surgeons: ethics and professionalism].

Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation·2014

Same author

Critical appraisal of organ procurement under Maastricht 3 condition.

Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation·2014

Same author

[Euthanasia, assisted suicide and palliative care: a review by the Ethics Committee of the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care].

Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation·2012

Same author

[Critical appraisal of organ procurement under Maastricht 3 condition].

Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation·2012

Same author

[Evidence-based medicine: methods and critics].

Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation·2007

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Kenneth J. Rothman and multicausality in epidemiology.

¹Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, hôpital G.- et R. -Laënnec, boulevard Jacques-Monod, Saint-Herblain, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France. philippe.bizouarn@chu-nantes.fr

Revue D'Epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique

|January 24, 2012

Summary

The Rothman model defined causality using sufficiency and necessity, addressing multicausality in chronic diseases. This epidemiological model offers a valuable perspective beyond traditional risk factor analysis.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Causality theory
Philosophy of science

Background:

The sufficient-component cause model emerged in the 1970s to address multicausality in chronic diseases.
This article focuses on presenting the Rothman model of causality as introduced in his 1976 "Causes" article.

Discussion:

The Rothman model, emphasizing sufficiency and necessity over probability, established a valid concept of cause.
While influential, the model faced challenges in practical application for multicausality issues in epidemiology.
The article contrasts the Rothman model's theoretical framework with its practical implementation and limitations.

Key Insights:

Sufficiency and necessity provide a robust framework for defining causality, distinct from probabilistic approaches.
The Rothman model advanced epidemiological understanding of causation, offering a novel perspective.
The model's conceptual strengths in defining cause contrast with practical challenges in solving multicausality problems.

Outlook:

The Rothman model significantly advanced the conceptualization of cause in epidemiology.
It provided a framework for understanding disease etiology beyond the "risk factor" paradigm.
Further research can explore refinements to address the practical limitations of the Rothman model in complex causal scenarios.