Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sample Size Determination for Response-Adaptive Randomization With Recurrent Event Responses and Unequal Follow-Up Time.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Rank-based methods for assessing equivalence/non-inferiority with assay sensitivity in a three-arm trial with ordinal endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Sample size determination for interval estimation of the prevalence of a sensitive attribute under non-randomized response models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2024
Same author

Multiple assessments of non-inferiority trials with ordinal endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2023
Same author

Comparison of treatments with ordinal responses in trials with sequential monitoring and response-adaptive randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same author

Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations under double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Multiple comparisons with a control for a latent variable model with ordered categorical responses.

Tong-Yu Lu1, Wai-Yin Poon2, Siu Hung Cheung3

  • 1College of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|January 24, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new statistical method for comparing multiple treatments to a control group using ordered categorical data. The approach avoids the proportional odds assumption, offering a more reliable analysis in clinical trials.

Keywords:
family-wise error rateordered categorical responseproportional odds assumptionstepwise procedure

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Ordered categorical data are common in clinical studies, often analyzed using logistic regression.
  • The proportional odds assumption in logistic regression may not always be appropriate, leading to inflated Type I error rates.
  • Existing alternative methods are limited to comparing only two treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel statistical testing procedures for comparing multiple treatments against a control.
  • To address the limitations of the proportional odds assumption in analyzing ordered categorical data.
  • To provide a robust method for multiple comparisons with a control in clinical trial settings.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a latent variable model with an underlying latent normal distribution.
  • Deriving new testing procedures for comparing several treatments to a control.
  • Applying the proposed procedures to data from clinical trials for illustration.

Main Results:

  • The proposed procedure provides a valid method for comparing multiple treatments to a control without the proportional odds assumption.
  • Demonstrated utility in analyzing clinical trial data where multiple treatment comparisons are of interest.
  • Offers an alternative to methods that may inflate the probability of false rejections.

Conclusions:

  • The developed statistical procedure is valuable for clinical studies involving multiple treatment comparisons against a control.
  • This method offers a more accurate analysis of ordered categorical data when the proportional odds assumption is violated.
  • The latent variable model approach provides a flexible framework for complex clinical trial designs.