Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026
Non-Invasive PET/MR Imaging in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: August 31, 2022
Perfusion MRI for monitoring the effect of sorafenib on experimental prostate carcinoma: a validation study
Clemens C Cyran1, Philipp M Paprottka, Bettina Schwarz
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Center for Experimental Radiology, University Hospitals Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. Clemens.Cyran@med.lmu.de
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to investigate with immunohistochemical validation whether dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with small-molecule contrast medium is useful for monitoring the effects of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib on prostate carcinomas in rats.
Materials And Methods:
Copenhagen rats (n = 20) into which prostate carcinoma (MAT-Ly-Lu-B2) had been implanted subcutaneously were imaged on the day of implantation and 7 days later with 3-T dynamic gadobutrol-enhanced MRI. The therapy group (n = 10) received daily administration of 10 mg/kg body weight sorafenib. Quantitative measurements of tumor perfusion, tumor vascularity, and permeability-surface area product were calculated with a two-compartment model. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI values were correlated with immunohistochemical results for validation.
Results:
Tumor perfusion in sorafenib-treated prostate carcinoma declined significantly from day 0 to day 7 (47.9 ± 36.8 mL/100 mL/min to 24.4 ± 18.6 mL/100 mL/min; p < 0.05). No significant effect on permeability-surface area product was observed in either the therapy or the control group (p > 0.05). Tumor vascularity decreased significantly (p < 0.05) from day 0 to day 7 under sorafenib treatment (15.6% ± 11.4% to 5.4% ± 2.1%). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed significantly lower tumor vascularity in the therapy than in the control group (rat endothelial cell antigen 1, 74.4 ± 16.9 cells vs 197 ± 75.4 cells; p < 0.05). In sorafenib-treated tumors, significantly more apoptotic cells (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling, 6923 ± 3761 vs 3167 ± 1500; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer proliferating cells (Ki-67, 10,198 ± 3064 vs 15,003 ± 3674; p < 0.05) were observed than in the control group. Modest but significant correlations were observed between tumor perfusion and immunohistochemical tumor cell apoptosis (r = -0.56; p < 0.05) and between tumor perfusion and immunohistochemical tumor vascularity (r = 0.56; p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Tumor perfusion quantified with gadobutrol-enhanced dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can be used as a noninvasive surrogate parameter for monitoring the antiangiogenic, antiproliferative, and proapoptotic effects of sorafenib on prostate carcinoma allografts as validated with immunohistochemical analysis.
