Survival in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison between operative and nonoperative management

This study evaluates the risk benefit relationship in the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Two hundred and thirteen patients with AAA diagnosed by CT were selectively managed depending upon the size of the aneurysm, and were followed with a mean follow-up time of 5 years and 4 months. Aneurysms greater than 5 cm were generally operated on if no serious contraindication existed. Aneurysms less than 5 cm were followed by repeated examinations and operated on if an increase in size occurred. Some small aneurysms were operated on for other reasons. Elective surgical management of 134 patients resulted in a thirty day mortality of 7.5%. Later, seven additional patients died from causes related to the surgery. Survival of electively operated patients by life table analysis was 68% at 5 years. A significantly higher mortality was noted among those who had evidence of coronary heart disease at the time of operation. Forty-two patients with AAA less than 5 cm at the initial examination were not operated on and three ruptured, but all had grown to a size greater than 5 cm at the time of rupture. Patients with AAA less than 5 cm that were not operated on had a slightly but not significantly higher mortality than those who were operated on electively. This difference was mainly attributable to deaths from cardiac causes and not to ruptures. Patients with aneurysms greater than 5 cm who were not operated on had a significantly higher mortality than those that were, only 14% in the former group survived.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)