Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Quantitative analysis of left ventricular dyssynchrony using cardiac computed tomography versus three-dimensional
Sebastian J Buss1, Felix Schulz, David Wolf
1Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) offers a faster and more reproducible method for assessing left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony compared to real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE). This makes CCT a promising alternative for patients considered for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Techniques
Background:
- Assessing left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony is crucial for patients considered for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).
- Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) is a current method for this assessment.
- Limitations of RT3DE include analysis time and reproducibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the feasibility of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) in determining intraventricular dyssynchrony.
- To compare CCT with RT3DE for dyssynchrony assessment in CRT candidates.
- To evaluate the reproducibility and analysis time of CCT versus RT3DE.
Main Methods:
- 35 patients considered for CRT underwent both RT3DE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced 64-slice dual-source CCT.
- Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony was quantified using the standard deviation index (SDI) with the 4D LV-Analysis software for both techniques.
- Comparison focused on correlation of SDI, end-systolic volume, end-diastolic volume, and LV ejection fraction.
Main Results:
- High correlations were found between CCT and RT3DE for volumetric parameters (r=0.92-0.95) and global dyssynchrony index SDI (r=0.84).
- Correlation for SDI improved to r=0.90 after excluding segments with poor echocardiographic image quality.
- CCT analysis time was significantly shorter (162s vs. 608s) and reproducibility was significantly higher (4.5% vs. 7.9% interobserver variability) compared to RT3DE.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative assessment of LV dyssynchrony is feasible using CCT.
- CCT demonstrates higher reproducibility and significantly faster analysis times than RT3DE.
- CCT presents a valuable alternative for dyssynchrony assessment in patients considered for CRT.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

