Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Left radial versus right radial approach for coronary artery catheterization: a prospective comparison
Marcello Dominici1, Roberto Diletti, Caterina Milici
1Division of Cardiology, Santa Maria University Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Insights
The left radial approach for coronary angiography is safe and feasible, reducing procedure time and catheter use compared to the right radial approach. This method offers advantages in daily practice for cardiac interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access
Background:
- Transradial access for coronary interventions offers advantages but has low adoption due to technical challenges with the right radial artery.
- The left radial approach presents potential anatomical benefits for vascular access.
- This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of routine left radial versus right radial access.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and feasibility of left radial artery access versus right radial artery access for coronary artery catheterization.
- To evaluate clinical outcomes and procedural efficiency between the two radial approaches.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, single-center study comparing left radial and right radial access for coronary angiography.
- Assessment of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), procedural success, bleeding, vascular complications, fluoroscopy time, catheter utilization, and contrast volume.
Main Results:
- 1,032 coronary angiograms performed (420 right radial, 612 left radial).
- No significant differences in MACCE or procedural success rates between groups.
- Left radial access showed significantly reduced fluoroscopy time and fewer catheters used (P < 0.01).
- No major bleeding or vascular complications requiring surgery were reported; contrast volume was similar.
Conclusions:
- The left radial approach is safe and feasible for routine use in daily practice for coronary interventions.
- Left radial access is associated with improved procedural efficiency, indicated by reduced fluoroscopy time and catheter usage.
Background:
Despite several advantages of the transradial over the transfemoral approach, the use of transradial access for coronary interventions in daily practice is still low. Major limitations are the technical and anatomical issues related with right radial artery access. The left radial approach may have an advantage from the point of view of the vascular anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of routinely using the left radial compared to the right radial approach.
Methods:
This is a prospective single center study comparing left radial to right radial access for coronary artery catheterization. The overall in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), procedural success rate, bleeding, vascular and procedural complications, fluoroscopy time, number of catheters, and amount of contrast agent used were assessed.
Results:
A total of 1,032 coronary angiograms were performed: 420 were performed using the right radial artery and 612 the left radial artery. No differences were observed in MACCE and success rate between the two groups. No cases of major or minor bleeding and vascular complications requiring surgical intervention were reported. Fluoroscopy time and the number of catheters used were significantly less in the left radial group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively), while the volume of contrast was similar (P = 0.264).
Conclusions:
The left radial approach in our series was demonstrated to be safe and feasible in daily practice, and in this study was associated with a reduction in fluoroscopy time and number of catheters used.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

