Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

System for Focal, Closed-System Central Nervous System Injury
Published on: November 29, 2024
Ground-level falls: 9-year cumulative experience in a regionalized trauma system
Alan Cook1, Angela Cade, Brad King
1Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas (Cook); Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Tyler, Texas (Cade); Departments of Emergency Medicine (King) and Trauma Surgery (Berne), East Texas Medical Center, Tyler, Texas; Department of Trauma Services, Trinity Mother Frances Health System, Tyler, Texas (Fernandez); and Department of Trauma Surgery, Regional Medical Center Bayonet Point, Hudson, Florida (Norwood).
Ground-level falls cause many US injuries. This study found risk-adjusted mortality for ground-level falls varied little across trauma center levels from 2002-2009, suggesting appropriate regional triage. Further research is needed on lower mortality at Level I centers.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Geriatric Trauma
- Public Health
Background:
- Ground-level falls (GLFs) are a primary cause of nonfatal hospitalized injuries in the United States.
- Older adults are disproportionately affected by GLFs, leading to significant morbidity and healthcare utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if risk-adjusted mortality rates for ground-level fall patients differ across trauma center verification levels.
- To assess the impact of regional triage systems on outcomes for GLF patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of a regional trauma registry from 2001-2009.
- Inclusion of 8202 patients who experienced ground-level falls.
- Application of a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model to compare risk-adjusted mortality.
Main Results:
- Patients treated at Level I trauma centers had a higher unadjusted probability of death (6.0%) compared to Level II (3.1%) and Level III/IV (1.1%) centers.
- Risk-adjusted mortality was lowest at Level I centers (OR 0.71), with no significant difference between Level II and Level III/IV centers.
- Risk-adjusted mortality for GLF patients showed minimal variation across trauma center levels from 2002 to 2009.
Conclusions:
- Regional risk-adjusted mortality for ground-level falls has remained relatively stable since 2002.
- The observed lower risk-adjusted mortality at Level I centers warrants further investigation.
- Findings suggest the importance of appropriate regional triage for optimizing outcomes in the growing population of older adults experiencing GLFs.
Related Concept Videos
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events, are a...

