Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Inadequate reporting of concomitant drug treatment in cardiovascular interventional head-to-head trials
Felix Mahfoud1, Michael Böhm, Magnus Baumhäkel
1University Hospital of the Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
Insights
Optimal medical treatment is often underreported in trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This highlights potential undertreatment of secondary prevention in cardiovascular disease patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease (CAD) remains debated, influenced by trials like SYNTAX.
- Evidence-based medical prevention is crucial for CAD, yet patients may be undertreated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reporting of concomitant medical treatment in head-to-head trials comparing CABG and PCI.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of cardiovascular interventional trials comparing CABG and PCI.
- Included trials with over 500 patients.
Main Results:
- 2106 articles were identified; only 3 trials reported on medical treatment.
- Baseline medication data were available from RITA, CABRI, and SYNTAX trials.
- Follow-up medication data were limited to CABRI and SYNTAX (3-year).
Conclusions:
- Poor reporting of medical treatment at discharge suggests potential underestimation of secondary prevention.
- The debate on optimal revascularization must consider concomitant medical treatment strategies.
Background:
Optimal revascularization strategy is still under debate in patients with coronary artery disease, particularly due to the results of the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Although medical prevention has been clearly shown to be beneficial in coronary artery disease, it has been suggested that patients were significantly undertreated with evidence-based medications for cardiovascular protection.
Hypothesis:
The purpose of the study was to evaluate concomitant medical treatment in cardiovascular interventional head-to-head trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
A systematic search of the literature regarding documentation and reports of medical treatment in cardiovascular interventional head-to-head trials with more than 500 patients comparing CABG and PCI was performed.
Results:
Systematic research of the literature identified 2106 articles of potential interest. After review and selection, only 3 trials reported on medical treatment. Baseline medication was reported in the RITA (Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina), CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation), and SYNTAX trials, and follow-up data were provided by the CABRI and SYNTAX 3-year trials only.
Conclusions:
Poor reporting of medical treatment at discharge might reflect an underestimation of secondary prevention in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or interventional procedures in head-to-head interventional trials. Thus, discussion of optimal revascularization procedure has to remain open, even in terms of concomitant medical treatment of patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers