Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Close Relationships and Culture01:29

Close Relationships and Culture

Culture shapes how people approach attraction, choose partners, and build long-term relationships. While some preferences in mate selection appear consistent across cultures, such as men valuing physical attractiveness and women emphasizing financial resources, cultural contexts influence how these preferences are expressed and prioritized. Marriage extends beyond romantic ideals in many societies and is deeply embedded in social, economic, and religious frameworks.The Role of Culture in Mate...
Self Within Cultural Contexts01:30

Self Within Cultural Contexts

Cultural frameworks for understanding the self are often categorized into two broad orientations: individualism and collectivism. These paradigms influence how people define themselves, relate to others, and interpret their social worlds. Each orientation offers distinct perspectives on autonomy, responsibility, and the role of the individual within a community.Individualistic CulturesIn individualistic cultures like North America and Western Europe, identity is understood as autonomous and...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Analysis and evaluation of educational supervision practices in Gambian schools.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Program evaluation plan assessing African American male achievement at predominantly white institutions: New Jersey education opportunity fund.

Evaluation and program planning·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Aligning collaborative and culturally responsive evaluation approaches.

Karyl Askew1, Monifa Green Beverly, Michelle L Jay

  • 1School of Education, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States. karyls@email.unc.edu

Evaluation and Program Planning
|January 31, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares collaborative evaluation and culturally responsive evaluation. Combining both approaches enhances evaluation validity and cultural competence, ensuring marginalized voices are adequately addressed.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Program Evaluation
  • Social Sciences
  • Cultural Studies

Background:

  • Collaborative evaluation immerses evaluators in program cultures and engages stakeholders.
  • Culturally responsive evaluation addresses issues of race, power, and privilege.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively analyze collaborative evaluation and culturally responsive evaluation.
  • To explore how integrating these approaches enhances evaluation outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of existing evaluation frameworks.
  • Literature review of collaborative and culturally responsive evaluation principles.

Main Results:

  • Collaborative evaluation fosters stakeholder engagement and co-creation of understanding.
  • Culturally responsive evaluation is crucial for addressing marginalized populations' concerns.
  • Integrating both approaches improves evaluation responsiveness, validity, utility, and cultural competence.

Conclusions:

  • The intentional application of collaborative evaluation techniques with a culturally responsive stance is essential.
  • This integrated approach ensures that the voices and concerns of marginalized groups are explicitly and adequately addressed.
  • Enhanced cultural competence of evaluators is a key outcome of this integrated methodology.