Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Noncompliance in AIDS research.

J D Arras1

  • 1Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY.

The Hastings Center Report
|September 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Participants in AIDS research sometimes cite coercion for non-compliance. A better social policy involves community engagement and access to therapies to improve adherence.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A method in search of a purpose: the internal morality of medicine.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001
Same author

Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2001
Same author

AZT trials and tribulations.

The Hastings Center report·1998
Same author

Physician-assisted suicide: a tragic view.

The Journal of contemporary health law and policy·1997
Same author

Reproductive responsibility and long-acting contraceptives.

The Hastings Center report·1995
Same author

The technological tether. An introduction to ethical and social issues in high-tech home care.

The Hastings Center report·1994

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health Policy
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Participants in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) research may cite a "coercion defense" to justify non-compliance with study protocols.
  • This defense, while potentially lacking philosophical rigor, highlights ethical considerations in research participation.
  • Ensuring participant adherence is crucial for the validity and success of AIDS research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the implications of the "coercion defense" in AIDS research.
  • To propose social policy strategies for enhancing participant compliance in clinical trials.
  • To address ethical challenges related to participant adherence and access to therapies.

Main Methods:

  • This study is primarily a conceptual and policy analysis.
  • It examines existing literature on research ethics, coercion, and compliance in clinical trials.
  • It synthesizes arguments regarding social policy interventions.

Main Results:

  • The "coercion defense" may not be a philosophically sound justification for non-compliance.
  • Prudent social policies can significantly improve participant adherence.
  • Community participation and access to non-validated therapies are identified as key strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Ethical considerations in AIDS research necessitate proactive social policies.
  • Enhancing community involvement and access to diverse therapeutic options can foster greater compliance.
  • A balanced approach is needed to uphold research integrity while supporting participant welfare.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchHealth Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos