Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using speed to think about space and time.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Attraction versus repulsion: Are central tendency effects and duration adaptation effects based on an altered perception of time?

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

What can claims data tell us about risk factors and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma? Insights from a German population-based study.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Treatment gaps and survival outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma: insights from a nationwide, claims-based study.

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology·2025
Same author

Infliximab is a safe and effective treatment in steroid-refractory immune-related hepatitis.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2025
Same author

Interferences between time and space in advanced age.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A "view from nowhen" on time perception experiments.

Martin Riemer1, Jörg Trojan, Dieter Kleinböhl

  • 1Otto Selz Institute for Applied Psychology, Mannheim Centre for Work and Health, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. martin.riemer@osi.uni-mannheim.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic errors in time reproduction tasks may not stem from temporal misperception. Instead, methodological constraints related to the direction of time likely cause these errors, challenging current time perception models.

More Related Videos

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Systematic errors in time reproduction tasks are often attributed to temporal misperception.
  • This interpretation challenges established pacemaker-accumulator models of time perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an alternative explanation for systematic errors in time reproduction tasks.
  • To investigate the role of methodological constraints, specifically the direction of time, in these errors.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to assess the influence of dimensional change direction on pitch and brightness estimates.
  • Participants' performance in time reproduction tasks was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Results indicate that the direction of dimensional change influences estimates.
  • Errors in time reproduction tasks appear to be a methodological artifact, not a reflection of temporal misperception.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that systematic errors in time reproduction do not represent a true temporal misperception.
  • Methodological constraints related to the direction of time are a more plausible explanation.
  • This has implications for refining contemporary models of time perception.