Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to R01:11

Introduction to R

R is a powerful software environment for statistical computing and graphics. Originating as an implementation of the S language, developed at Bell Laboratories, R has evolved into a robust, open-source statistical software favored by statisticians and data scientists worldwide. Its comprehensive suite includes data manipulation, calculation, and graphical display capabilities, making it versatile for data analysis and visualization. Its programming language is at the core of R's functionality,...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)01:15

High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)

The resolution of a mass spectrometer depends on the efficiency of separating ions with different ion masses. The mass of an atom is approximated to the sum of the masses of protons and neutrons inside, considering the masses of protons and neutrons as equal. However, the masses of the proton (1.6726 × 10−24 g) and neutron (1.6749 × 10−24 g) are not truly equal. There is a minor error in the expression of atomic masses relative to the simplest atom of hydrogen. For example, the mass of helium...
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative Genomics Reveals the Evolutionary Expansion and Diversification of the NPF Gene Family in Grasses.

Genes·2026
Same author

Non-transcriptional activity of IRF3 promotes liver fibrosis and stress granule assembly via a dsRNA-TLR3-dependent pathway in hepatic stellate cells.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
Same author

ADOPT model combined with structured health education alleviates the preoperative anxiety of patients undergoing preventive ileostomy.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Integrated phenotypic, physiological, transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses uncover the mechanisms underlying root and leaf responses of Osmanthus fragrans to Pb toxicity.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes on the Impact of Radiation Therapy on Sexual Health in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same author

Integrated transcriptomic, untargeted and targeted metabolomic analyses reveal seasonal regulatory mechanisms of vascular cambium activity in woody plants: insights from <i>Schima superba</i>.

Frontiers in plant science·2026
Same journal

Bridging the gap between student research needs and library services for a health sciences writing course.

Medical reference services quarterly·2026
Same journal

National Agricultural Library (NAL) SEARCH.

Medical reference services quarterly·2026
Same journal

Problem-based learning (PBL) library resources and support: survey insights from first-year dental students.

Medical reference services quarterly·2026
Same journal

Curriculum collection alignment in pharmacy education: insights from Namibia for global practice.

Medical reference services quarterly·2026
Same journal

AI in practice: trends in hospital and clinic libraries.

Medical reference services quarterly·2026
Same journal

Onboarding experiences of early career health sciences librarians.

Medical reference services quarterly·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Comparison of select reference management tools.

Yingting Zhang1

  • 1University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Library of the Health Sciences, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Place, P.O. Box 19, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA. yzhang@umdnj.edu

Medical Reference Services Quarterly
|February 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares four reference management tools: EndNote/EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop/Mendeley Web. It analyzes their strengths and weaknesses in accessing, collecting, organizing, collaborating, and citing references for researchers.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics and Information Science
  • Scientific Communication

Background:

  • Bibliographic management tools are essential for researchers to organize references.
  • Numerous tools exist, making selection challenging based on user needs.
  • Understanding tool functionalities is crucial for effective research management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare four popular reference management tools: EndNote/EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop/Mendeley Web.
  • To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each tool for researchers.
  • To aid users in selecting the most suitable tool for their specific requirements.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of four reference management tools.
  • Evaluation based on functionality, ease of use, availability, and popularity.
  • Features assessed include accessing, collecting, organizing, collaborating, and citing/formatting references.

Main Results:

  • Detailed analysis of EndNote/EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop/Mendeley Web.
  • Identification of key strengths and weaknesses for each tool.
  • A comparison table summarizing features is provided for quick reference.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a comprehensive overview of selected reference management tools.
  • Informed decision-making regarding reference management software is facilitated.
  • Researchers can better choose tools aligned with their workflow and needs.