Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
In medio stat virtus: theoretical and methodological extremes regarding reciprocity will not explain complex social
1SISSA/ISAS-International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste, Italy. civai@sissa.it
Abstract:
Guala contests the validity of strong reciprocity as a key element in shaping social behavior by contrasting evidence from experimental games to that of natural and historic data. He suggests that in order to understand the evolution of social behavior researchers should focus on natural data and weak reciprocity. We disagree with Guala's proposal to shift the focus of the study from one extreme of the spectrum (strong reciprocity) to the other extreme (weak reciprocity). We argue that the study of the evolution of social behavior must be comparative in nature, and we point out experimental evidence that shows that social behavior is not cooperation determined by a set of fixed factors. We argue for a model that sees social behavior as a dynamic interaction of genetic and environmental factors.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity
Social Exchange Theory
Social Exchange Theory
Equity Theory
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
