Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Importing social preferences across contexts and the pitfall of over-generalization across theories
Anne C Pisor1, Daniel M T Fessler
1Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3210, USA. pisor@umail.ucsb.edu
Abstract:
Claims regarding negative strong reciprocity do indeed rest on experiments lacking established external validity, often without even a small "menu of options." Guala's review should prompt strong reciprocity proponents to extend the real-world validity of their work, exploring the preferences participants bring to experiments. That said, Guala's approach fails to differentiate among group selection approaches and glosses over cross-cultural variability.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
07:43A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
Published on: August 4, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Implicit Personality Theories
Fundamental Attribution Error
Social Proof
First Impression
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory