Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026
03:22
Microbiological Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Pulmonary Infectious Diseases
Published on: March 1, 2024
Evaluating a new rapid response team: NP-led versus intensivist-led comparisons
Kimberly Scherr1, Donna M Wilson, Joan Wagner
1Misericordia Hospital, 2E-83 16940-87th Ave, Edmonton, AB, Canada. kim.scherr@covenanthealth.ca
AACN Advanced Critical Care
|February 1, 2012
Summary
Nurse practitioner-led rapid response teams (RRTs) are safe and effective alternatives to physician-led teams. This study found no significant differences in patient outcomes, suggesting NP-led RRTs can improve hospital care.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Nursing Practice
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Rapid response teams (RRTs) are crucial for improving patient outcomes in hospitals.
- Validation of nurse practitioner (NP)-led RRT models is needed.
- Evaluating NP-led RRTs offers insights into alternative healthcare delivery models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a newly implemented NP-led RRT.
- To compare patient outcomes between NP-led and intensivist physician-led RRTs.
- To assess ward nurses' perceptions of NP-led RRT performance.
Main Methods:
- A descriptive-comparative mixed-methods study design was employed.
- Quantitative data from 255 patients receiving RRT calls were analyzed.
- Qualitative data were gathered through a paper survey of ward nurses.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in cardiorespiratory arrests, unplanned ICU admissions, or hospital mortality.
- Patient outcomes did not differ significantly between NP-led and intensivist-led RRTs.
- Nurses reported confidence in NP-led RRTs and perceived improved patient outcomes.
Conclusions:
- NP-led RRTs are a safe and effective alternative to traditional intensivist-led teams.
- Further research is required to confirm RRTs' impact on overall hospital care quality and patient outcomes.
- Implementing NP-led RRTs demonstrates a viable strategy for enhancing critical care response.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
01:29Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Diagnosing Pulmonary EmbolismDiagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) involves clinical assessment and advanced imaging tests. The preferred diagnostic tool is the spiral (helical) CT scan or CT angiography (CTA), which uses intravenous contrast media to visualize the pulmonary vasculature and identify emboli.A ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan is an alternative for patients unable to receive contrast media. This scan includes both perfusion and ventilation scanning. Perfusion scanning involves...
01:20Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
Assessment of Ventilation
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation: