Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026
08:26
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time?
1Medical Student - School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK. omarehaly@googlemail.com
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
|February 1, 2012
Summary
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) is increasingly cost-effective over time compared to open surgery. Initial training costs are offset by long-term savings, especially in expensive healthcare systems.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Health Economics
- Colorectal Surgery
Background:
- Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) offers superior short-term outcomes compared to open colorectal surgery.
- The cost-effectiveness of LCS remains less clear despite its clinical benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the economic evaluations of LCS since its inception in 1991.
- To analyze the trend of LCS cost-effectiveness over time.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of economic evaluations from 1991 to 2010.
- Searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar using keywords: "laparoscopic, colorectal surgery cost, economic evaluation".
Main Results:
- Fifteen economic evaluations were included, showing wide variations in cost differences between open and LCS.
- A moderate negative correlation was observed between time and the cost gap (R=-0.44), indicating decreasing cost differences.
- This trend was stronger in Western healthcare systems, showing declining LCS costs over time (R=-0.64, P=0.046).
Conclusions:
- Future economic evaluations are projected to demonstrate LCS as more cost-effective than open surgery.
- Initial investment in LCS training may yield significant long-term savings, particularly in high-cost postoperative care settings.
