Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ASO Author Reflections: Timing of Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction-Expanding Access without Compromising Technical Success.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Breast implants and autoimmune disease: from signal detection to registry surveillance.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Timing of Surgical Axillary Staging and Impact on Technical Success of Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Development and Implementation of a Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Surgical Case Duration.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same author

Breast implant surface texture is associated with distinct implant microbiome profiles in humans.

Acta biomaterialia·2026
Same author

Commentary on: Multiplex CD30/Carbonic Anhydrase IX Lateral Flow Assay for Rapid Triage of Suspected BIA-ALCL in Peri-implant Seroma Fluid.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Cephalometric analysis for microvascular head and neck reconstruction.

Edward I Chang1, Mark W Clemens, Patrick B Garvey

  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Head & Neck
|February 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study provides normative craniofacial dimensions for microvascular free flap reconstruction. These measurements aid surgeons in designing reconstructions when original anatomy is unclear due to trauma or tumors.

More Related Videos

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
13:16

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts

Published on: December 22, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
13:16

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts

Published on: December 22, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Plastic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Limited data exists on craniofacial dimensions crucial for microvascular free flap reconstruction.
  • Existing literature primarily focuses on normative measurements of the craniofacial skeleton, not specific to reconstructive surgery needs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish normative cephalometric dimensions of the mandible and maxilla relevant for microvascular free flap reconstruction.
  • To compare these dimensions with fibular bone measurements for surgical planning.
  • To provide guidance for designing mandibular and maxillary reconstructions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans from 70 adult patients for cephalometric analysis.
  • Obtained fibular dimensions from a subset of 20 patients.
  • Compared craniofacial measurements between sexes and dentition states (full vs. edentulous).

Main Results:

  • Established normative cephalometric values (distances and angles) for the mandible and maxilla.
  • Presented comparative data between craniofacial structures and fibular dimensions.
  • Developed schematics to assist in the design of mandibular and maxillary reconstructions.
  • Identified differences in measurements between men and women, and between dentate and edentulous patients.

Conclusions:

  • Normative craniofacial dimensions serve as a valuable guide for flap design in complex head and neck reconstructions.
  • These measurements are particularly useful when premorbid anatomy is obscured by trauma or tumor.
  • The findings support the integration of these normative data into the surgical planning armamentarium for reconstructive procedures.