Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prognostic grouping: the next step in tumor classification.

P Hermanek1, R V Hutter, L H Sobin

  • 1Department of Surgical Pathology, University of Erlangen, Federal Republic of Germany.

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International histological classification of tumours of domestic animals: Introduction.

Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2010
Same author

Polymorphisms in Th1-type cell-mediated response genes and risk of gastric cancer.

Carcinogenesis·2006
Same author

Locoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2003
Same author

The pathological assessment of mesorectal excision: implications for further treatment and quality management.

International journal of colorectal disease·2003
Same author

[Interdisciplinary cooperation as a prerequisite for precise tumor documentation. Illustrated by an example of surgery for colorectal carcinoma].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2003
Same author

[G-DRG version 1.0--it becomes a serious issue now].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2003

This study explores prognostic grouping for cancer staging beyond the T(umor) N(odes) M(etastasis) classification. It aims to identify new factors and models for predicting tumor progression and patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Biostatistics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Current cancer staging relies on the anatomical extent of disease using the T(umor) N(odes) M(etastasis) classification.
  • There is a need for improved methods to predict cancer progression and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify additional independent prognostic factors for malignant tumors.
  • To develop mathematical models for prognostic grouping to predict disease progression.
  • To summarize challenges, methodologies, and study designs for prognostic grouping.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing problems in tumor classification.
  • Exploration of various methods for prognostic grouping.
  • Analysis of the design of coordinated studies focused on prognostic grouping.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified limitations in current anatomical staging systems.
  • Highlighted the importance of independent prognostic factors.
  • Outlined approaches for developing predictive mathematical models.

Conclusions:

  • Prognostic grouping offers a promising avenue for refining cancer classification.
  • Further research is needed to integrate novel prognostic factors into clinical practice.
  • Mathematical modeling can enhance the prediction of tumor progression and patient stratification.