Dilemma in multifocal breast cancer – largest versus aggregate diameter
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026
Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Leong Ung Tiong1, Robert Parkyn, David Walters
1The Breast and Endocrine Surgical Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Australia. leongung@gmail.com
Background:
Several studies have shown that multifocal breast cancer has higher risks of lymph node metastases compared to unifocal cancer. This has a significant impact on prognosis and treatment options. We investigated whether this was true in our institution.
Methods:
This was a retrospective study involving 75 patients with multifocal breast cancer from the year 2000 to 2007. The data recorded were largest, aggregate and extent diameter, and outcomes measured were lymph node metastases, disease recurrence and mortality rate.We randomly selected 77 age-matched subjects with unifocal cancer from the same time period for comparison.
Results:
The average age was 57 and 58 years for the unifocal and multifocal groups, respectively. In the multifocal group, there were 54.6% ductal, 26.7% lobular and 17.3% mixed/other cancers. The unifocal group consisted of 84.4% ductal, 6.5% lobular and 9.1% mixed/other cancers. In the multifocal group, largest diameter was available for 74 patients averaging 22.1 mm. The average diameter in unifocal cancer was 18.4 mm. Fifty-two per cent of the multifocal subjects had positive lymph nodes compared with 36% in the unifocal group.
Conclusion:
Our data showed that multifocality was associated with a higher rate of lymph node metastases. This might indicate that multifocal breast cancer reflected a heavier disease burden than unifocal cancer and should be treated more aggressively.
