Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Second-look endoscopy for bleeding peptic ulcer disease: a decision-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis
1Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. timperia@iupui.edu
Routine second-look endoscopy for bleeding peptic ulcers is not routinely advised. It may be cost-effective only if rebleeding risk exceeds 31%.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Second-look endoscopy (SLE) after initial therapeutic endoscopy for bleeding peptic ulcer disease (PUD) may reduce rebleeding.
- However, routine SLE is not currently recommended, necessitating an understanding of its clinical utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes and costs of routine second-look endoscopy versus no second-look endoscopy for bleeding peptic ulcer disease.
Main Methods:
- A decision model was employed, incorporating literature-based probabilities and Medicare reimbursement costs.
- The study evaluated rebleeding rates, surgical necessity, hospital mortality, and associated costs.
- Cost-effectiveness was assessed by calculating the cost to avoid each outcome (number needed to treat) and cost per outcome prevented.
Main Results:
- Routine SLE reduced rebleeding from 16% to 10% (NNT=16) with a cost of nearly $13,000 per rebleeding case prevented.
- Cost neutrality between routine SLE and no SLE was achieved at a rebleeding threshold of 31%.
- If SLE was 100% effective, the cost-neutral rebleeding threshold decreased to 17.5%.
Conclusions:
- Routine second-look endoscopy is not indicated for bleeding peptic ulcer disease following initial therapeutic endoscopy.
- SLE may be considered if the initial rebleeding risk is 31% or higher, as it can reduce risk without additional cost.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Complications
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current medication...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
