Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Predictors of local venous complications resulting from electrophysiological procedures
Abolfath Alizadeh1, Amir Hosein Yazdi, Mohammad Kafi
1Department of Pacemaker and Electrophysiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Alizadeh_73@yahoo.com
Insights
Heparinization during electrophysiological procedures reduced in situ thrombosis, especially with single venous line cannulation and in women. Deep vein thrombosis was not observed, suggesting heparin may not be necessary for right-sided procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) carries a 0.6% risk of thromboembolic complications.
- Multiple venous sheaths are often required for electrophysiological studies and RFCA, necessitating placement in a single femoral vein.
- The safety of single venous line cannulation for multiple sheaths requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety of placing multiple venous sheaths via a single venous line.
- To assess the effect of heparinization on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and in situ thrombosis during these procedures.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial involving 200 patients.
- Comparison of single venous line cannulation versus separate venous sheath placement.
- Analysis of heparinization protocols and their impact on thrombosis rates.
Main Results:
- No cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were observed.
- Heparinization significantly reduced in situ thrombosis (28% vs. 11%, p=0.04).
- Single venous line cannulation showed a higher in situ thrombosis rate (16% vs. 6% with heparin, p=0.1; 38% vs. 18% without heparin, p=0.04).
- Women had a significantly higher rate of in situ thrombosis than men (26% vs. 11%, p=0.01).
Conclusions:
- Heparinization is not essential for right-sided electrophysiological procedures due to low DVT risk.
- In situ thrombosis is a minor complication manageable with heparinization, particularly for single venous line cannulation and in women.
- Advanced age did not influence thrombosis rates.
Background:
Thromboembolic complications resulting from radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) have an overall incidence of 0.6%. Multiple intracardiac catheters are often necessary for electrophysiological study and RFCA therapy. Therefore, the placement of multiple venous sheaths in one femoral vein is always required for multiple intracardiac catheter insertion. The safety of the placement of multiple separate venous sheaths has been studied previously in a non-randomized study, but the placement of multiple sheaths via one venous line has not been fully studied.
Methods And Results:
A randomized clinical trial was conducted with a total of 200 patients. We studied the safety of placing multiple sheaths via one venous line, and the effect of heparin on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and on in situ thrombosis. DVT was not seen in our patients. We observed a significant decrease in the rate of in situ thrombosis in patients who received heparin during the procedure (28% vs 11%, p = 0.04). The type of cannulation changed the in situ thrombosis rate independently of the heparinization protocol. The rate of in situ thrombosis was higher when placing sheaths via one venous line regardless of the heparinization protocol used (16% vs 6%, p = 0.1 for the group on heparin, and 38% vs 18%, p = 0.04 for the other group). In the group cannulated with only one venous line (100 patients), heparinization significantly decreased the rate of in situ thrombosis (16% vs 38%, p = 0.023), but there was an insignificant decrease in the separate cannulation group (6% vs 18%, p = 0.12). Advanced age had no effect on thrombosis. Surprisingly, there was a significantly greater rate of in situ thrombosis (not DVT) among women than among men (26% vs 11%, p = 0.01), regardless of the heparinization protocolor the type of cannulation.
Conclusions:
Given the local venous complications and DVT after electrophysiological procedures, heparinization is not necessary for right-sided electrophysiological procedures. In situ thrombosis is a minor complication that can be reduced by heparinization in patients undergoing one-line cannulation and in women during longer procedures.
More Related Videos
08:05Occlusion of the Great and Small Saphenous Vein Using Copolymeric Glue Based on N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Methacryloxy Sulfolane
Published on: December 9, 2022
05:51Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...