Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Foundations of psychoanalysis reconsidered.

W W Meissner1

  • 1Boston Psychoanalytic Institute.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Notes on Monotheism · the argument.

Journal of religion and health·2014
Same author

Notes on monotheism · origins.

Journal of religion and health·2014
Same author

Notes on monotheism: Psychodynamic aspects.

Journal of religion and health·2014
Same author

Notes on the psychology of faith.

Journal of religion and health·2014
Same author

Notes toward a theory of values: The place of values.

Journal of religion and health·2014
Same author

Notes toward a theory of values: Values as psychological.

Journal of religion and health·2014
Same journal

Why I Write: My Journey.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2026
Same journal

Book Essay: Perspectives on Aging: Countering Ageism in Psychoanalytic ThoughtMidlife: Humanity's Secret Weapon. By <i>Andrew Jamieson</i>. Burneside, UK: Notting Hill Editions, 2022, 144 pp., $19.95 hardcover.Psychoanalysis of Aging and Maturity: The Concept of Maturescence. By <i>Guillermo Julio Montero</i>. Abington, UK: Routledge, 2020, 144 pp., $34.49 paperback.Blooming in December: Psychodynamic Psychotherapy With Older Adults. By <i>Amy Schaffer</i>. Abington, UK: Routledge, 2021, 119 pp., $27.24 paperback.Breaking the Age Code: How Your Beliefs About Aging Determine How Long and Well You Live. By <i>Becca Levy</i>. New York: HarperCollins, 2022, 294 pp., $15.99 paperback.Life Reimagined: The Science, Art, and Opportunity of Midlife. By <i>Barbara Bradley Hagerty</i>. New York: Riverhead, 2016, 451 pp., $24.00 paperback.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2026
Same journal

From the Editors.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2026
Same journal

Essay: Marianne Goldberger: A Mold-Breaking Psychoanalyst in Her Time, and Importantly, for Ours.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2026
Same journal

Why I Podcast.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2026
Same journal

The Humanistic Basis of Psychoanalytic Practice.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2026
See all related articles

Grünbaum's critique of psychoanalysis uses flawed logic and imposes unrealistic scientific standards. This approach misrepresents psychoanalytic knowledge and hinders the development of valid assessment methods for psychological understanding.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Psychoanalytic Theory
  • Psychological Research Methods

Background:

  • Adolf Grünbaum's philosophical critique challenges the scientific validity of psychoanalysis.
  • Concerns exist regarding the applicability of strict scientific standards to psychoanalytic knowledge.
  • The nature of psychoanalytic practice and its epistemological underpinnings are subjects of ongoing debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the methodological and philosophical underpinnings of Grünbaum's critique of psychoanalysis.
  • To identify the limitations of applying logical reductionism and dichotomous reasoning to psychoanalytic propositions.
  • To argue that Grünbaum's standards of verification are unattainable for psychoanalysis and psychological knowledge.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of Grünbaum's philosophical arguments regarding psychoanalysis.
  • Examination of the logical structure and assumptions within Grünbaum's critique.
  • Comparison of Grünbaum's proposed standards with the actual practice and knowledge claims of psychoanalysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Grünbaum's approach imposes an overly rigid and inappropriate standard of logical reductionism and methodological purity.
    • The critique utilizes dichotomous reasoning, creating artificial positions for psychoanalytic propositions that do not reflect clinical reality.
    • The standards of verification proposed by Grünbaum are deemed unattainable for psychoanalysis and other forms of psychological knowledge.
    • Grünbaum's model inaccurately represents psychoanalysis, focusing on a narrow dimension and creating a 'straw man' that is unrecognizable to practitioners.

    Conclusions:

    • Grünbaum's critique, while skillful, falls short of providing a useful basis for advancing psychoanalytic knowledge.
    • The argument's limitations hinder the quest for appropriate and pertinent standards of validation within psychoanalysis.
    • A more nuanced understanding of psychoanalytic knowledge is required, moving beyond overly simplistic or reductionist philosophical frameworks.