Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
Breast sonographic elastography using an advanced breast tissue-specific imaging preset: initial clinical results
Hyun Jin Jung1, Soo Yeon Hahn, Hye-Young Choi
1Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea.
Sonographic elastography with a tissue-specific imaging preset showed strong diagnostic performance for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses, with the strain ratio being the most effective criterion.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Ultrasound
- Breast Imaging
Background:
- Distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses is crucial for appropriate patient management.
- Conventional sonography has limitations in accurately differentiating breast lesions.
- Sonographic elastography offers complementary information to conventional ultrasound.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate interpretation criteria of sonographic elastography (size ratio, stain ratio, elasticity score) using a tissue-specific imaging preset.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of elastography with conventional sonography for breast mass differentiation.
- To assess the utility of elastography in improving breast lesion characterization.
Main Methods:
- Conventional sonography and elastography with a tissue-specific preset were performed on 104 patients with 110 breast lesions.
- Interpretation criteria including size ratio, strain ratio, and elasticity score were analyzed.
- Pathologic results from surgical excision or vacuum-assisted removal served as the reference standard.
Main Results:
- Sonographic elastography demonstrated high diagnostic performance, with the strain ratio showing the best results among elastography criteria (AUC 0.901).
- Conventional sonography achieved an AUC of 0.959, with sensitivity and specificity of 93.0% and 83.6% between BI-RADS 4A and 4B.
- Using a strain ratio cutoff of 4.215 yielded 86.0% sensitivity and 85.1% specificity.
Conclusions:
- The strain ratio is the most effective interpretation criterion for sonographic elastography with a tissue-specific imaging preset in breast mass differentiation.
- While elastography shows promise, conventional sonography performance, particularly using BI-RADS categories, was slightly superior, though not statistically significant (P = .052).
- Further research may explore optimizing elastography parameters and integration with conventional techniques for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

