Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

02:08
Surgical Bone Implantation Technique for Rat Tibia Models of Diabetes and Osteoporosis
Published on: July 5, 2024
Relationship between subsinus bone height and bone volume requirements for dental implants: a human radiographic
Dana Kopecka1, Antonin Simunek, Tomas Brazda
1Department of Dentistry, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|February 3, 2012
Summary
Subsinus alveolar bone height (SBH) varies significantly across the maxilla, decreasing towards the molars. Understanding this bone availability is crucial for dental implant placement strategies.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Radiology
Background:
- The maxillary sinus floor presents a common anatomical challenge for endosseous dental implant placement.
- Assessing available subsinus alveolar bone height (SBH) is critical for successful implant osseointegration.
- Variations in SBH necessitate tailored surgical approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively analyze the vertical dimension of subsinus alveolar bone.
- To determine the available bone height for endosseous implant placement in the edentulous maxilla.
- To correlate SBH with anatomical landmarks for surgical planning.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 583 panoramic radiographs of edentulous maxillae.
- Measurement of subsinus alveolar bone height (SBH) in millimeters.
- Categorization of SBH into three groups: <5 mm (A), 5-9 mm (B), and >9 mm (C).
- Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon paired test (P < .05).
Main Results:
- The anterior border of the maxillary sinus was superior to the first premolar in 96.9% of cases.
- Mean SBH decreased from canine (11.4 ± 6.2 mm) to first molar (3.3 ± 2.2 mm) regions.
- Significant proportions of sites in the premolar and molar regions had limited SBH (<5 mm or 5-9 mm).
Conclusions:
- Subsinus alveolar bone height is greatest anteriorly and diminishes posteriorly, reaching a minimum at the first molar.
- The lateral window technique for sinus elevation is indicated in the molar region due to limited bone height.
- Less invasive augmentation techniques may be suitable for the premolar region, offering alternative treatment options.
