Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Coronary flow reserve in patients with aortic stenosis and nonobstructed coronary arteries
Marko D Banovic1, Bosiljka D Vujisic-Tesic, Vuk G Kujacic
1Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. markobanovic71@gmail.com
Insights
Aortic valve resistance (AVR) best predicts impaired coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and no coronary artery disease. This finding aids in assessing cardiovascular event risk in AS patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis (AS) and clear coronary arteries often exhibit impaired coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR).
- CFVR is a significant independent predictor of future cardiovascular events in AS patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify which factors, including left ventricular (LV) mass, wall thickness, diastolic dysfunction, LV workload, and hemodynamic indices of AS severity, most significantly contribute to impaired CFVR.
- To determine the primary determinant of impaired CFVR in AS patients without obstructive epicardial coronary disease.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 77 patients with moderate or severe AS and nonobstructed coronary angiograms.
- Standard Doppler-echocardiography, coronary angiography, and adenosine-stress transthoracic Doppler-echocardiography for CFVR measurement were performed.
- Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess associations between various parameters and impaired CFVR, with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine predictive accuracy.
Main Results:
- Univariate analysis indicated that aortic valve area (AVA), maximal velocity (Vmax), mean pressure gradient (Pmean), energy loss index (ELI), aortic valve resistance (AVR), and stroke work loss (SWL) were associated with impaired CFVR (P ≤ 0.05).
- Multivariate analysis identified AVR as the strongest predictor of impaired CFVR (RR 0.900, P = 0.007).
- ROC analysis revealed an AVR value of 211.22 dynes x s x cm(-5) as the most accurate predictor of impaired CFVR (AUC = 0.681, P = 0.007).
Conclusions:
- Hemodynamic indices of AS severity and LV workload parameters are key determinants of CFVR in AS patients.
- Aortic valve resistance (AVR) emerges as the most potent predictor of impaired CFVR in patients with moderate or severe AS and unobstructed coronary arteries.
Objective:
Patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis (AS) and without obstructive epicardial coronary disease have been shown to have an impairment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). Recently, it has been shown that CFVR is an independent predictor for future cardiovascular events in AS patients. We investigated parameters representing left ventricular (LV) mass and wall thickness, diastolic dysfunction, LV workload and haemodynamic indexes of AS severity to determine which contributes the most to impaired CFVR in patients with AS and a nonobstructed coronary angiogram.
Method And Results:
A total of 77 patients with moderate or severe AS, mean age 65.66 +/- 11.02 y (57.14% males), were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients had standard Doppler-echo study, coronary angiography and adenosine-stress transthoracic Doppler-echo for CFVR measurement. We took 2.5 as a cut-off value for impaired CFVR. Univariate analysis showed that aortic valve area (AVA), maximal velocity (Vmax), mean pressure gradient (Pmean), energy loss index (ELI), aortic valve resistance (AVR) and stroke work loss (SWL) were associated (P = 0.05) with impaired CFVR. Multivariate analysis showed that AVR was the best predictor of impaired CFVR (RR 0.900, Cl: 0.983-0.997, P = 0.007). Using ROC analysis, the AVR value of 211.22 dynes x s x cm(-5) had the highest accuracy in predicting the impaired CFVR (AUC-0.681, P=0.007, sensitivity 72%, specificity 52%, CI: 0.561-0.800).
Conclusion:
Haemodynamic indices of AS severity, together with LV workload parameters, are the main determinants of CFVR. Among all parameters, AVR is the strongest predictor of CFVR in patients with moderate or severe AS and a nonobstructed coronary angiogram.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume
In an average resting adult male, the typical cardiac output averages...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

