Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution01:14

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution

Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MRI-scale histology validates spatial sensitivity of in-vivo MRI-based axon radius estimation.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Probing Hydrogen Activation in a Dimetal Dihydride Complex by Symmetric Exchange with Parahydrogen.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Analytical Dual Flip Angle R1 Calculation Outside the Small-Angle Regime.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2025
Same author

Chemical hydrodynamics of nuclear spin states.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Short association fibres form topographic sheets in the human V1-V2 processing stream.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Simulation of pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization in the steady state.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same journal

Anharmonic phonons via quantum thermal bath simulations.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Quantum simulation of alignment dependent differential cross sections in co-propagating molecular beams at cold collision energies.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Non-additive ion effects on the coil-globule equilibrium of a generic polymer in aqueous salt solutions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Insights into the unexpected small reduction of the temperature of maximum density of water by lithium chloride addition.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Optical frequency comb double-resonance spectroscopy of the 9030-9175 cm-1 states of ethylene.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Time reversal breaking of colloidal particles in cells.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging
06:34

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: September 2, 2016

Parallel density matrix propagation in spin dynamics simulations.

Luke J Edwards1, Ilya Kuprov

  • 1Oxford e-Research Centre, University of Oxford, 7 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QG, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|February 4, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces efficient parallel computing methods for density matrix propagation. These techniques minimize communication overhead, enabling faster simulations on large clusters.

More Related Videos

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

New Features in Visual Dynamics 3.0
05:00

New Features in Visual Dynamics 3.0

Published on: August 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging
06:34

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: September 2, 2016

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

New Features in Visual Dynamics 3.0
05:00

New Features in Visual Dynamics 3.0

Published on: August 9, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Computational Physics
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • High-Performance Computing

Background:

  • Density matrix propagation is crucial for simulating quantum systems.
  • Existing parallel methods often suffer from high communication overhead.
  • Efficient parallelization is key for tackling larger and more complex quantum simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel parallel computing methods for density matrix propagation.
  • To reduce or eliminate inter-thread communication during simulation steps.
  • To demonstrate the scalability of the proposed methods on modern computing clusters.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed several algorithms for density matrix propagation in parallel environments.
  • Focused on reformulating the propagation step to minimize communication.
  • Evaluated performance on a 128-core cluster.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that significant communication overhead can be avoided.
  • Recasted the simulation to require minimal inter-thread communication.
  • Achieved good parallel scaling on a 128-core cluster.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methods offer an efficient approach to parallel density matrix propagation.
  • Reduced communication overhead leads to improved simulation performance.
  • The approach is scalable and suitable for large-scale scientific computing.