Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Dynamic and static mechanical analysis of resin luting cements
K Tolidis1, D Papadogiannis, Y Papadogiannis
1Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, PO Box 54006, Greece.
This study evaluated four resin cements for dental restorations. Mechanical properties varied with temperature and moisture, with none fully recovering from creep, suggesting limitations for high-stress applications.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Polymer Chemistry
Background:
- Resin cements are widely used as luting agents for indirect dental restorations.
- Understanding their mechanical properties under oral conditions is crucial for clinical success.
- Contemporary resin cements require thorough evaluation of their performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the mechanical properties of four contemporary resin luting agents.
- To investigate the influence of temperature and moisture on these properties.
- To evaluate the creep behavior and permanent deformation of the tested cements.
Main Methods:
- Four resin cements (Choice 2, Clearfil Esthetic Cement, Resicem, RelyX Unicem) were tested.
- Dynamic and static testing evaluated shear and flexural modulus, loss tangent, viscosity, and Poisson's ratio at 21°C (dry/wet), 37°C, and 50°C.
- Creep testing was performed under constant loads for 3 hours with a 50-hour recovery period.
Main Results:
- Choice 2 exhibited the highest modulus, while RelyX Unicem had the lowest.
- Water presence affected all cements, with RelyX Unicem being least affected.
- Increased temperature impacted properties, with Resicem showing the least susceptibility.
- Permanent deformation after creep testing ranged from 0.43% to 5.53%; no full recovery was observed.
- No significant transitions were noted under tested conditions.
Conclusions:
- The tested resin cements demonstrate satisfactory mechanical behavior for restorations not subjected to significant mechanical stress.
- Oral cavity conditions, including moisture and temperature fluctuations, can influence the performance of these materials.
- Clinical performance in stress-bearing restorations may be compromised due to environmental factors affecting mechanical properties.
Related Concept Videos
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in ASTM C...
Microcracking in Concrete
Soundness of Cement
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is critical—it...
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen also...
