Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Responses to visual motion of neurons in the extrastriate visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental amblyopia.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024

Same author

Neuronal composition of processing modules in human V1: laminar density for neuronal and non-neuronal populations and a comparison with macaque.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2024

Same author

Contrast and Luminance Gain Control in the Macaque's Lateral Geniculate Nucleus.

eNeuro·2023

Same author

Omit needless words: Sentence length perception.

PloS one·2023

Same author

Double dissociation in radial and rotational motion sensitivity.

PloS one·2021

Same author

GABAergic and non-GABAergic subpopulations of Kv3.1b-expressing neurons in macaque V2 and MT: laminar distributions and proportion of total neuronal population.

Brain structure & function·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Right hemifield deficits in judging simultaneity: a perceptual learning study.

Nestor Matthews¹, Michael Vawter, Jenna G Kelly

¹Department of Psychology, Denison University, OH 43023, USA. matthewsn@denison.edu

Journal of Vision

|February 4, 2012

Summary

Right visual field (RVF) simultaneity judgments are less precise than in the left visual field (LVF). This study reveals RVF deficits stem from temporal acuity limitations and attentional processing, which perceptual learning can improve.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Psychology
Visual Perception

Background:

Previous research indicates reduced precision in right visual field (RVF) simultaneity judgments compared to the left visual field (LVF).
The underlying mechanisms and the specific visual processing stage responsible for RVF deficits remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the reasons for and the visual information stage at which RVF deficits in simultaneity judgments emerge.
To differentiate between temporal acuity and neural noise as causes of RVF simultaneity deficits.
To explore the role of attention and distractor processing in RVF performance.

Main Methods:

Psychophysical experiments involving simultaneity and spatial frequency discrimination tasks in RVF and LVF.
Manipulation of distractor presence and attentional demands.
Signal detection theory analysis to characterize error patterns.
Perceptual learning procedures to assess plasticity and identify critical processing stages.

Main Results:

An RVF simultaneity deficit was observed, primarily linked to reduced temporal acuity when distractors were absent.
Attentionally demanding distractors introduced a distinct RVF deficit, suggesting inappropriate integration of temporal information.
These deficits were specific to simultaneity judgments and not observed in spatial frequency discrimination.
Perceptual learning significantly improved RVF simultaneity performance, with generalization to the LVF and novel locations.

Conclusions:

RVF simultaneity deficits arise from both inherent limitations in temporal acuity and attentional processing of distractors.
The simultaneity decision stage appears to be the critical bottleneck for performance.
Perceptual learning demonstrates the plasticity of these visual processing deficits.