Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Public philosophy: distinction without authority.

P T Menzel1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA 98447.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When comes "the end of the day?" A comment on the dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt.

The Hastings Center report·1998
Same author

QALYs: maximisation, distribution and consent. A response to Alan Williams.

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·1995
Same author

The pros and cons of immunisation.

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·1995
Same author

To anyone morally perplexed about the politics of US health care.

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·1995
Same author

Rescuing lives. Can't we count?

The Hastings Center report·1994
Same author

Double agency and the ethics of rationing health care: a response to Marcia Angell.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·1993

Philosophers can guide bioethical policy by clarifying options and challenging assumptions, but they do not dictate final policy. Their role involves critiquing culture and politics, not settling factual or political support issues.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Public Policy
  • Ethical Theory

Background:

  • Normative ethical principles offer a framework but rarely substantive solutions for public policy.
  • Bioethical policy formulation necessitates addressing complex underlying philosophical controversies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define the specific and appropriate role of professional philosophers in bioethical public policy development.
  • To delineate the boundaries of philosophical expertise in policy-making.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the intersection between ethical theory and public policy.
  • Examination of the philosopher's contribution to policy debates through clarification and argumentation.
  • Distinguishing between philosophical competence and factual/political considerations.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Philosophers should clarify ethical options, press for consistency, and engage in substantive argumentation.
  • Philosophers retain a critical role regarding culture, politics, and their profession, even when political support is lacking.
  • Philosophers lack authority over the philosophical presuppositions of public policy.

Conclusions:

  • The philosopher's contribution to bioethical policy is primarily analytical and critical, not determinative.
  • Effective bioethical policy requires integrating philosophical insights with factual and political realities.
  • Philosophers must recognize the limits of their authority while embracing their role in public discourse.