Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
Modeling in Therapy01:26

Modeling in Therapy

Modeling, a key technique in therapy, uses observational learning to help clients acquire and practice new skills by watching therapists demonstrate desired behaviors. This approach, rooted in Albert Bandura's concept of vicarious learning, plays a significant role in therapeutic interventions for various psychological conditions, including social anxiety, ADHD, and depression.
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...
Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving01:29

Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving

Mathematical modeling transforms real-world scenarios into mathematical expressions, allowing for structured problem-solving and analysis. This process involves defining the situation, assigning variables to measurable quantities, selecting an appropriate model, and solving the resulting equation. Such models are invaluable in finance, providing precise methods to evaluate investments, loans, and repayment structures.A widely used example is the calculation of fixed monthly payments on a loan,...
Modeling and Similitude01:12

Modeling and Similitude

Scaled modeling is a fundamental technique in engineering, enabling the study of large and complex systems by creating smaller, manageable replicas that recreate critical characteristics of the original. In hydrology and civil infrastructure, for example, scaled models of dams help analyze water flow, turbulence, and pressure. This method allows for accurate predictions of real-world behavior within a controlled environment, significantly reducing the cost and time involved in full-scale...
Modeling with Differential Equations01:25

Modeling with Differential Equations

Population dynamics can be described mathematically by considering the population size P(t) as a function of time. The rate of change of the population is then represented by the derivative of P(t). A simple assumption is that the rate of growth is proportional to the size of the population itself. This leads to an exponential growth model, where the population increases rapidly without bound. While this is a useful first approximation, it does not reflect realistic long-term...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing the efficiency of forward and backward contact tracing.

Physical review. E·2023
Same author

A global synchronization theorem for oscillators on a random graph.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

Asymptotic Absorption-Time Distributions in Extinction-Prone Markov Processes.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Coupled metronomes on a moving platform with Coulomb friction.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

Modeling the Interplay Between Seasonal Flu Outcomes and Individual Vaccination Decisions.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2022
Same author

How a minority can win: Unrepresentative outcomes in a simple model of voter turnout.

Physical review. E·2021

Related Experiment Videos

Education of a model student.

Timothy P Novikoff1, Jon M Kleinberg, Steven H Strogatz

  • 1Center for Applied Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|February 7, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Teachers and educational software designers face a challenge balancing new material with timely reviews. This study introduces a mathematical model for optimal scheduling, ensuring effective learning through personalized review pacing.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Educational Technology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • Educators and instructional designers grapple with the balance between introducing new content and reinforcing existing knowledge.
  • Effective review timing is crucial; reviews that are too early or too late diminish learning benefits.
  • Individual learners exhibit varied rates of forgetting, necessitating personalized review schedules.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a mathematical model addressing the trade-off between teaching new material and conducting effective reviews.
  • To incorporate student-specific review needs and optimal spacing into a scheduling framework.
  • To create algorithms for generating educational schedules that meet diverse learning constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Formulated a mathematical model representing student learning needs as scheduling constraints.
  • Developed algorithms to construct educational schedules based on specified spacing requirements.
  • Analyzed the model to determine bounds on the rate of new material introduction.

Main Results:

  • The model provides a framework for optimizing the balance between new content delivery and spaced review.
  • Algorithms were generated to create schedules that satisfy various temporal spacing constraints for learning.
  • Theoretical bounds were established for the pace at which new educational material can be introduced.

Conclusions:

  • Mathematical modeling offers a robust approach to optimizing educational scheduling and review processes.
  • Personalized review schedules, informed by student needs, can enhance learning efficiency.
  • The findings provide insights for designing more effective educational software and curricula.