Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Intentional inferences are not more likely than unintentional ones: some evidence against the intentionality bias
Jamie S Hughes1, Joshua Sandry, David Trafimow
1Daemen College, Department of Psychology, 4380 Main St., Amherst, NY 14226, USA. jhughes@daemen.edu
Abstract:
We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that inferences about intentionality are biased toward an intentional interpretation. Contrary to previous research, participants were no more likely to judge ambiguous actions as intentional in a speeded compared to an unspeeded condition. Further, participants were faster to respond and more consistent in responding to unintentional rather than intentional actions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Cause and Effect
Correspondence Bias
Fundamental Attribution Error
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Motivational Bias

