Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

A Method for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Ethanol in Rats without Water Deprivation, Saccharin Fading or Extended Access Training
Published on: January 29, 2017
Additive feeding inhibitory and aversive effects of naltrexone and exendin-4 combinations
N-C Liang1, N T Bello, T H Moran
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. nliang2@jhmi.edu
Objective:
One developing strategy for obesity treatment has been to use combinations of differently acting pharmacotherapies to improve weight loss with fewer adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the combination of naltrexone (Nal), an opioid antagonist acting on the reward system, and exendin-4 (Ex-4), a glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist acting on satiety signaling, would produce larger reductions in food intake than either alone in rats. Because the anorectic potencies of both compounds have been associated with nausea and malaise, the influence of these drug combinations on the acquisition of a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) was also determined.
Methods:
In Experiment 1, the acute anorectic effects of Nal (0.32-3.2 mg kg(-1); intraperitoneally (i.p.)) and Ex-4 (1-10 microg kg(-1); i.p.) were assessed alone or in combination. Combinational doses were further investigated by the repeated daily administration of 1 mg kg(-1) Nal+3.2 microg kg(-1) Ex-4 for 4 days. In Experiment 2, both compounds alone or in combination were used as unconditioned stimuli in a series of CTA tests.
Results:
Nal and Ex-4, alone or in combination, suppressed food intake in a dose-dependent manner, and the interaction on food intake between Nal and Ex-4 was additive. In the CTA paradigm, Nal (1 mg kg(-1)) alone did not support acquisition, whereas a CTA was evident with doses of Ex-4 (1 or 3.2 microg kg(-1)). Combinations of Nal and Ex-4 also resulted in a more rapid and robust acquisition of a CTA.
Conclusion:
Given that the Nal and Ex-4 combination produces additive effects on not only food intake reduction but also food aversion learning, this specific drug combination does not have the benefit of minimizing the adverse effects associated with each individual drug. These data suggest that it is necessary to evaluate both the positive and adverse effects at early stages of combinational drug development.
More Related Videos
08:07Simultaneous Detection of c-Fos Activation from Mesolimbic and Mesocortical Dopamine Reward Sites Following Naive Sugar and Fat Ingestion in Rats
Published on: August 24, 2016
09:29Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
CNS Depressants: Alcohol and Nicotine
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis
Several...
Regulation of Food Intake
Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral bioavailability, and...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Synthesis