The influence of different placement techniques on the microtensile bond strength of low-shrink silorane composite...

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a low-shrink silorane-based composite (Filtek Silorane) and a methacrylate-based composite (Filtek Z250) to the bottom dentin of a Class I cavity using different placement techniques. Twelve third molars were used. Standard, box-type Class I cavities (6.0 x 4.0 x 2.5 mm) were prepared at the occlusal crown center, with the pulpal floor ending approximately at the midcoronal dentin. The teeth were then randomly divided into four groups, according to each placement technique: ZI--Filtek Z250 placed incrementally; ZB--Filtek Z250 placed in bulk; SI--Filtek Silorane placed incrementally; and SB--Filtek Silorane placed in bulk. Each restored third molar was subjected to microtensile bond testing after 24 hours of storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C. After storage, each molar was longitudinally sectioned in both axes to obtain rectangular sticks with an approximate 0.49 mm2 cross-sectional area. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post hoc test (P = 0.05). After debonding, the failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope. The ZI group (72.6 MPa) showed the highest µTBS, followed by the ZB group (60.2 MPa), while the SI (34.4 MPa) and SB (42.6 MPa) groups demonstrated statistically significant lower bond strengths. The type of placement technique did not influence the µTBS of silorane-based composites to the bottom dentin of Class I cavities. The methacrylate-based composite showed superior performance, regardless of the placement technique.