Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

Test for Homogeneity

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...

One-Way ANOVA

One-Way ANOVA

One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Reply to 'Boundary issues for multidimensional frameworks of representation'.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026

Same author

Can Data Mining Improve Methane Correction Factors for Urban, Nonsewered Sanitation?

Environmental science & technology·2026

Same author

Daring few, patient many: Division of labor in decentralized foraging collectives.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Plasticization as a tool for tuning the dynamics of polymerized ionic liquids: insights from molecular dynamics simulations.

Soft matter·2026

Same author

Dynamical scaling of coarse-grained ionic liquid under shear flow.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026

Same author

Distilling noise characteristics and prior expectations in multisensory causal inference.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Optimal inference of sameness.

Ronald van den Berg¹, Michael Vogel, Kresimir Josic

¹Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

|February 9, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Human perception of sameness, even with noisy data, can be accurately modeled as optimal probabilistic inference. This finding provides a quantitative framework for understanding how we judge objects as same or different.

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive science
Perception research
Computational neuroscience

Background:

Sameness judgment is fundamental to cognition but lacks a quantitative model.
Previous research has not established a principled framework for understanding how humans and animals make sameness judgments under uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

To test if human sameness judgment under sensory noise can be modeled as optimal probabilistic inference.
To develop and validate a quantitative model for sameness judgment.

Main Methods:

Conducted two experiments manipulating set size and stimulus reliability.
Applied an optimal-observer model comparing reliability-weighted variance to a set size-dependent criterion.
Performed rigorous model comparison against alternative models.

Main Results:

The optimal-observer model accurately described human behavioral data.
The proposed model outperformed alternative computational models.
The model explained key findings in animal cognition literature regarding sameness judgments.

Conclusions:

Human sameness judgment, even with sensory noise, aligns with principles of near-optimal probabilistic inference.
This research establishes a normative, quantitative foundation for studying sameness judgment.
The findings suggest that perception of abstract relations, like sameness, is near-optimal.