Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key aspect...
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison01:14

Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison

The acceptance criteria for dissolution profile data are anchored in Q values, representing the percentage of drug dissolved within a specified period. This assessment unfolds in three stages:First Stage: The test passes if all six drug dosage units are equal to or greater than Q plus 5%; otherwise, the sample proceeds to the second stage.Second Stage: The average of twelve units must be equal to or greater than Q, with no unit falling below Q - 15% to pass; if not, it progresses to the final...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prospective comparative study for the evaluation of prosthetic rehabilitation users with transtibial amputation.

Ciencia & saude coletiva·2016
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain, performance anxiety, and stress-producing life events among orchestral players in Brazil: An observational study.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

From dirty work to safety performance: A mixed-methods study on chemical workers' safety compliance and participation in China.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Interventions to manage back pain in agriculture, horticulture, and seafood workers - A scoping review.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Working under digital pressure: Electronic performance monitoring, psychological contracts, and job crafting among construction and engineering professionals.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

From exclusion to inclusion: How spiritual leadership shapes workplace relationships.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

An easier government? The impact of digital government platform on government employee overtime.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

Common criteria for usability review.

Victor Nassar1

  • 1Design Deparment, Federal University of Paraná, Ed. Dom Pedro , Rua General Carneiro 460, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Work (Reading, Mass.)
|February 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This literature review synthesizes common usability criteria from leading experts like Nielsen and Shneiderman. It highlights consistent measures for evaluating user interface effectiveness across different approaches.

More Related Videos

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
04:54

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Published on: March 19, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
04:54

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Published on: March 19, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Software Engineering
  • Usability Engineering

Background:

  • Establishing effective user interfaces requires understanding diverse usability criteria.
  • Several prominent frameworks exist, including those by Bastien and Scapin, Nielsen, Shneiderman, Dix et al., Preece et al., and ISO 9241-110.
  • User characteristics are a prerequisite for defining and applying usability criteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a literature review of common usability criteria.
  • To group and present usability approaches from key researchers and standards.
  • To identify and explain shared usability criteria.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review methodology.
  • Synthesis and grouping of usability criteria from cited authors and standards.
  • Analysis of common themes in usability evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Identified common usability criteria: consistency, user control, ease of learning, flexibility, error management, reduction of redundancy, and system status visibility.
  • Despite variations in specific approaches, a significant equivalence in adopted usability measures was observed.
  • User characteristics are foundational for effective system design.

Conclusions:

  • Common usability criteria are consistently recognized across different expert frameworks.
  • While specific methodologies vary, the core principles for evaluating interface usability are largely equivalent.
  • Understanding user characteristics is crucial for applying these usability criteria effectively.